Kodi Community Forum

Full Version: Intel NUC - Haswell (4th Generation CPU)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(2014-01-11, 14:32)john.cord Wrote: [ -> ]Yes but this "Celeron N2820" is way more powerful compared to the Celeron 847 (1,1GHz vs. 2,4GHz). Btw, this was just a example. There will be "h" NUCs with i3 and i5 too. The "h" stands for "high" wich means that there is space for a standard 2,5" HDD or SSD.

I am not so sure...

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...40+1.10GHz

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...Hz&id=2109

the second link is the N2810 and not the 2820. But almost the same. Only 0,4 ghz...

I dont understand this results... Maybe because of 2MB vs 1MB Cache?
Clock speed isn't everthing, in fact it is less and less important these days.
Synthetic benchmark...
Something is still not compl. running right with VA-API, every now and then when
i start a new movie i get no sound and heavy stutter again but i dont have a clue how it triggers..
Starting a log after the problem occurs wouldnt make much sense i guess..?
The Log is always started, or do you mean the Debug Level?
(2014-01-13, 00:22)tfouto Wrote: [ -> ]
(2014-01-11, 14:32)john.cord Wrote: [ -> ]Yes but this "Celeron N2820" is way more powerful compared to the Celeron 847 (1,1GHz vs. 2,4GHz). Btw, this was just a example. There will be "h" NUCs with i3 and i5 too. The "h" stands for "high" wich means that there is space for a standard 2,5" HDD or SSD.

I am not so sure...

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...40+1.10GHz

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...Hz&id=2109

the second link is the N2810 and not the 2820. But almost the same. Only 0,4 ghz...

I dont understand this results... Maybe because of 2MB vs 1MB Cache?

I would not rely on that site... the old celeron is 17W TDP and the new one 4,5/7,5W with the same power in that synthetic Benchmark wich says nothing about real world performance...
I am a bit pessimistic, especially for the Yadif Usage later on. If "real world cpu benchmarks" are slower than Celeron 1007, I don't see a chance there.

For non interlaced, so progressive content. It might not be an issue at all, as this is purely done with VAAPI.
(2014-01-13, 09:50)-DDD- Wrote: [ -> ]The Log is always started, or do you mean the Debug Level?

I mean if i start debugging while the problem is already triggered..
(2014-01-13, 11:14)john.cord Wrote: [ -> ]
(2014-01-13, 00:22)tfouto Wrote: [ -> ]
(2014-01-11, 14:32)john.cord Wrote: [ -> ]Yes but this "Celeron N2820" is way more powerful compared to the Celeron 847 (1,1GHz vs. 2,4GHz). Btw, this was just a example. There will be "h" NUCs with i3 and i5 too. The "h" stands for "high" wich means that there is space for a standard 2,5" HDD or SSD.

I am not so sure...

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...40+1.10GHz

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...Hz&id=2109

the second link is the N2810 and not the 2820. But almost the same. Only 0,4 ghz...

I dont understand this results... Maybe because of 2MB vs 1MB Cache?

I would not rely on that site... the old celeron is 17W TDP and the new one 4,5/7,5W with the same power in that synthetic Benchmark wich says nothing about real world performance...

Well maybe that's the reason. This new Celeron have much less power, at the expense of performance. They managed to lower power comsumption, and level the performance.

I think this CPU score is a good indicator of real world performance. Synthetic benchmarks are not everything for sure, but they give at least some useful information.

Sandy Bridge->Ivy bridge->Haswell had only marginal performance improvements ~ 10%. Power consumption/tablets is where Intel is focusing right now.
(2014-01-12, 23:03)-DDD- Wrote: [ -> ]why don't you set it to 20% like the others?

i dont dare to, my cpu idle is at 42-43 c with fanspeed at default. It seems a bit hot compared to the reviews im reading, idle temp is at 31 c. I starting to suspect there might be something wrong with my fan.
(2014-01-13, 00:22)tfouto Wrote: [ -> ]
(2014-01-11, 14:32)john.cord Wrote: [ -> ]Yes but this "Celeron N2820" is way more powerful compared to the Celeron 847 (1,1GHz vs. 2,4GHz). Btw, this was just a example. There will be "h" NUCs with i3 and i5 too. The "h" stands for "high" wich means that there is space for a standard 2,5" HDD or SSD.

I am not so sure...

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...40+1.10GHz

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...Hz&id=2109

the second link is the N2810 and not the 2820. But almost the same. Only 0,4 ghz...

I dont understand this results... Maybe because of 2MB vs 1MB Cache?

Quite easy to understand when you know that these "Celerons" are basically higher clocked "Atoms", There will be also "Pentiums" based on the silbermont architecture.

They are not based on haswell. Wink
They have out of order execution and SSE, MMX per Core. That's a big difference.
43°C isn't hot for me.

@ gamble: Yes, i would act like this:
- see if you see any Error in the existing Logfiles, post the existing Logfile if you see something and can't fix it
- activate Debug Level and try to reproduce the Failure
The Haswell can run up to 90 degrees C, it just slows down a bit.

Apparently its quite indestructible Smile

Mine runs at 74 maximum when playing music.

Playing videos is around 40 max
(2014-01-13, 14:38)fritsch Wrote: [ -> ]They have out of order execution and SSE, MMX per Core. That's a big difference.

Yes and for a dedicatedt xbmc box enough power for most of the users.