+- XBMC Community Forum (http://forum.xbmc.org)
+-- Forum: Help and Support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+--- Forum: XBMC General Help and Support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=111)
+---- Forum: Linux and Live support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=52)
+---- Thread: XBMC Ubuntu PPAs (precompiled PPA builds for Ubuntu) (/showthread.php?tid=33327)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150
- Zemy - 2010-08-26 18:53
Hannes The Hun Wrote:if you install either one of them, the other one will be installed as well (remember, dependencies)
In fact it didn't install the other one. First I installed xbmc-standalone and the behaviour continued...booting to login.
After that I installed the xbmc-live, then system rocked up directly.
So there must be some mess with the depencies.
Br, Zemy
- outleradam - 2010-08-26 19:32
X11-server-utils is not available as a package to install without selection of "basic ubuntu server" on installation.
- hudo - 2010-08-26 20:02
Something is wrong...
I always start installation of my machines with ubuntu minimal iso. I never choose "basic ubuntu server" on install. Apart from OpenSSH server, everything I choose is vanilla install from minimal iso... and x11-xserver-utils *is* available on 32 and 64bits.
Either way, the dependencies - apparently - should be corrected.
***EDIT***
I'm currently running xbmc on a M3N78-EM, BE-2350 CPU, 2GB RAM, 2x1TB HDD, 2xHVR-4000 DVB-S2, etc, running on top of Lucid 32bits and an Asrock 330 running Lucid 64bits...
- X3lectric - 2010-08-26 20:10
I dont install basic ubuntu server simply cause its not a option if you choose expert cli install (see signature)
I can install any deps simply because the sources are set.
Its almost idiot proof.
- hudo - 2010-08-26 20:15
X3lectric Wrote:I dont install basic ubuntu server simply cause its not a option if you choose expert cli install (see signature)
I can install any deps simply because the sources are set.
Its almost idiot proof.
That would be my guess, too!
Sources available = installation possible
- TutAmongUs - 2010-08-27 03:38
X3lectric Wrote:er its on my signature team iquik ppas and open them and check.
for stable check xbmc-stable for svn check xbmc-svn, it doest require me posting anything else.
My reply was to the OP, and it was simply a reference to the fact that you/he/whomever makes a verbal (written) announcement each time you/he/whomever 'burns' a new iso image. That announcement could mention the aforementioned number. Heck, the original post could carry a link or image where all you need do is update the image archive and the sticky post auto-magically auto-updates. Like a little web visit ticker thingy or such.
Waiting for your sig to carry it, and then hunting/digging that/you up is a little counterproductive with all these computers lying around.
Of course we ALL no how to derive and acquire the stable and svn builds and releases.
I was simply mentioning that some of the sticky posts here could easily carry dynamic info, links to FAQs, and all other manner of 'upgradedness'. It's like a programmer that goes around behind his code and cleans or 'spruces' it up.
I guess hi res smiley engines are more important.
ASCII ya laterz...
- tdw197 - 2010-08-31 15:28
yay!
version numbers sorted out for latest svn dharma beta 1 version
apt-get update -> dist-upgrade works perfectly!
- typhoe - 2010-09-15 19:24
Hi,
I got a probleme upgrading the xbmc-live package.
http://pastebin.com/f7yZhDrJ
xbmc-live
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/init.d/xbmc-live': File exists
I resolved my problem with:
sudo rm -f /etc/init.d/xbmc-live ; sudo apt-get install -f
I'm using Karmic:
typhoe@hornet:~$ uname -a
Linux hornet 2.6.31-22-generic #63-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 18 22:54:26 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
typhoe@hornet:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=9.10
DISTRIB_CODENAME=karmic
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 9.10"
Can I provide anymore information?
regards,
Typhoe
- outleradam - 2010-09-20 03:54
Ppa is working for me. Just updated last night.
- madmalkav - 2010-09-21 23:53
Anyone knows if SVN PPA will get Ubuntu Maverick (10.10) binaries before the official Maverick release?