Kodi Community Forum
Ability to choose an installed scraper on refresh button in video info screen - Printable Version

+- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=222)
+--- Forum: Feature Requests (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Ability to choose an installed scraper on refresh button in video info screen (/showthread.php?tid=375565)



Ability to choose an installed scraper on refresh button in video info screen - _BJ1 - 2023-12-28

Sometimes a scraper result is wrong or some infomation is missing on the default scraper. Other scrapers maybe do a more accurate job. Maybe it's an improvement to implement a context menu in video info dialog to choose an alternate scraper (if more then once installed) when refresh info is selected?


RE: Ability to choose an installed scraper on refresh button in video info screen - izprtxqkft - 2023-12-30

you can have multiple scrapers per movie titles just not the way you said

if you put your movies into subfolders

Movies
Movies/Point Break 2015
Movies/Point Break 2015/Point Break 2015.mp4

then the parent "Movies" can be set to TMDB while the subfolder "Point Break 2015" can be changed to something else via context -> "change content" in the files section


RE: Ability to choose an installed scraper on refresh button in video info screen - _BJ1 - 2023-12-30

(2023-12-30, 17:32)izprtxqkft Wrote: you can have multiple scrapers per movie titles just not the way you said

Yes. That's why it's a feature request. Your way is far too cumbersome, just to test whether an alternative scraper might deliver a better result without first rearranging the directory structure.


RE: Ability to choose an installed scraper on refresh button in video info screen - izprtxqkft - 2023-12-30

(2023-12-30, 19:05)_BJ1 Wrote:
(2023-12-30, 17:32)izprtxqkft Wrote: you can have multiple scrapers per movie titles just not the way you said

Yes. That's why it's a feature request. Your way is far too cumbersome, just to test whether an alternative scraper might deliver a better result without first rearranging the directory structure.

very good, i just tried to give you something you can use now but it seems you would rather wait years for a completed feature request so that by 2030 you can use it