XBMC live vs. ubuntu server + XBMC - Printable Version +- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +--- Forum: General Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=111) +---- Forum: Linux (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=52) +---- Thread: XBMC live vs. ubuntu server + XBMC (/showthread.php?tid=40491) |
XBMC live vs. ubuntu server + XBMC - Mackan2 - 2008-11-16 Are there any advantages/disadvantages in doing a true install (to USB) of Ubuntu server and xbmc instead of just running XBMC live? I guess boot time is shorter for the installed system. Any optimizations when running Live? Is stuff cached to RAM at boot? Can you guide me to a page describing how the Live file system works (with the img files and so on)? - assen - 2008-11-17 Hi, AFAIK, no real benefits from performance point of view. I use the Ubuntu server version, because it allows me to install on a USB with any size and filesystem I want - which is helpful for testing purposes and allows me to add some server-side software later (e.g., for audio recording from tapes and LPs). WWell, - Mackan2 - 2008-11-17 Installed Ubuntu CLI last night to be able to use my 8GB USB-stick and for easier install of myth later on. I noticed that a "ps -aux" gave me a much shorter list of running processes than on Live, whatever that means... |