![]() |
|
[LINUX] HOW-TO install XBMC for Linux on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) and 8.10 (Intrepid) - Printable Version +- XBMC Community Forum (http://forum.xbmc.org) +-- Forum: Announcements, Info, and General Discussion (/forumdisplay.php?fid=85) +--- Forum: Tips, tricks, and step by step guides (/forumdisplay.php?fid=110) +--- Thread: [LINUX] HOW-TO install XBMC for Linux on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) and 8.10 (Intrepid) (/showthread.php?tid=44019) |
- pyrates - 2009-03-14 23:31 olympia Wrote:Maybe because you also installed full version instead of mini.iso. It is working for numerous people who was properly followed everything. I installed it from the mini iso on both versions of Ubuntu, and both times I had to make those changes. - olympia - 2009-03-15 00:57 Asswipe44 Wrote:Sweet! One last thing, there's an option to select something like PCI VGA, PCIE VGA, and internal VGA. If I'm using the mobo NVIDIA, which of these do I select? I'm guessing it's the internal one. hmmmm. Interesting. Do you have other movies to try? - Asswipe44 - 2009-03-15 01:57 olympia Wrote:hmmmm. Interesting. Yeah, I have 1080p x264 version of The Dark Knight and it also has worse performance as in stuttering video and many frame drops. Does yours work fine when playing back 1080p files?
- majorheadache - 2009-03-15 06:23 olympia Wrote:Anyway, for me, Intrepid with vdpau branch seems to be a real winner combo as of today... I've heard bits and pieces here and there but I've never seen a definitive answer to this: what are the deciding factors when considering whether to go Hardy or Intrepid, in this specific application? - olympia - 2009-03-15 09:43 majorheadache Wrote:I've heard bits and pieces here and there but I've never seen a definitive answer to this: I would say only HW support at the moment. Intrepid is better supporting new HW. If your setup is fully supported by Hardy, there is no need to use Intrepid. Especially if you are not using the vdpau branch, because then you have to struggle with the performance bug of Intrepid. Personally I have to use Intrepid to have suspend up and running on my setup. - olympia - 2009-03-15 09:45 Asswipe44 Wrote:Yeah, I have 1080p x264 version of The Dark Knight and it also has worse performance as in stuttering video and many frame drops. Does yours work fine when playing back 1080p files? Yes indeed. It's working for VC1 files and x264 mkv's as well. That's weired. Did you install the linuxport before checked out the vdpau branch? Also, do you have nvidia 180.37 in place? - Asswipe44 - 2009-03-15 13:10 olympia Wrote:Yes indeed. It's working for VC1 files and x264 mkv's as well. I installed the VDPAU branch by itself without installing the linux port. Should I install the linuxport as per your instructions first? If so, how do I install the VDPAU branch on top of it? - olympia - 2009-03-15 15:25 Asswipe44 Wrote:I installed the VDPAU branch by itself without installing the linux port. Should I install the linuxport as per your instructions first? If so, how do I install the VDPAU branch on top of it? No, definitely not. It should be done in the way you did. Then I have no clue what can be the bottleneck. (network maybe) - xnappo - 2009-03-15 15:37 Asswipe44 Wrote:Yeah, I have 1080p x264 version of The Dark Knight and it also has worse performance as in stuttering video and many frame drops. Does yours work fine when playing back 1080p files? You are likely suffering from this problem: http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=46783 There are a couple of work-arounds in that thread. Starting in 'auto' then switching to 1080p, or just running in 1080i (which seems to really be 1080p anyway). xnappo - AllanMar - 2009-03-15 15:58 Try the starting XBMC is Auto then changing to 1080p and hitting test resolution first. Playing in 1080i hasnt been working perfectly for everyone with this problem.... |