![]() |
|
User experiences so far with the dx builds of xbmc - share them here.. - Printable Version +- XBMC Community Forum (http://forum.xbmc.org) +-- Forum: Help and Support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +--- Forum: XBMC General Help and Support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=111) +---- Forum: Windows support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +---- Thread: User experiences so far with the dx builds of xbmc - share them here.. (/showthread.php?tid=57681) |
- marirs - 2009-10-01 18:50 small tweak to get the video window of the dx builds to start in the correct monitor here. - azido - 2009-10-01 19:50 ezhik Wrote:No don't download it! I found this update available, thought it maybe just updated some component. It completely upset the CCC and the ATI driver. I ended up removing MS update and having a bit of a job getting the CCC and ATI driver running smooth again. a well-formed "thank you" then from my side. - azido - 2009-10-01 19:53 warwon Wrote:Windows update are using the 9.4 ATI drivers. lol.. it's placed to the windows update as being new since yesterday ![]() damned ms.. - azido - 2009-10-01 20:07 marirs Wrote:small tweak to get the video window of the dx builds to start in the correct monitor here. make sure to add this to a trac ticket so the devs will note your suggestion. if it works well, it might even go to one of the next svn versions. - fekker - 2009-10-01 23:48 CPU: core 2 @ 2.0ghz Mem: 4gb Video: intel mobile 4500hd Windows 7 32bit (rtm) XBMC Build r23283 Resolution: 1280x800 DX - UI FPS min 29fps, cpu load 40% GL - UI FPS min 17fps, cpu load 64% Max of both varies, both seem to hit 60fps, this is using pm3-hd and just going around in the UI The biggest difference is that in the directx build the cpu load is down and the FPS never drops into the teens (where very noticeable stuttering occurs) No playback errors, however i have a very limited set of items on this machine to test with. Keep up the great work! Very impressive builds. - sealight - 2009-10-02 01:03 fekker Wrote:XBMC Build r23283I'm worried... 40%, 64% of a 2ghz Core Due CPU just for the UI?! This is getting “out of control”… If built from scratch a UI like XBMC should never go beyond 5-10% on a modern computer. -What are your thoughts regarding this? Too much legacy weight? Lack of extended Hardware Acceleration? - patkhoo - 2009-10-02 11:40 warwon Wrote:Windows update are using the 9.4 ATI drivers. BTW, If you happen to be running an old(er) ATI card, say X300/X..series, your last driver from ATI is 9.8 (for all platforms).. After this, it is going into the legacy bin. Now, the default Win7 driver from Microsoft works, but quite frankly, it is extremely "basic".. - Nogger - 2009-10-02 13:47 HTPC: Asrock ION OS: Windows 7 32-bit Build :23267 Skin: Rapier Everything is working great, I'm streaming 720p from my NAS without any problems. Havn't really tried 1080p though since all my movies are in 720p. - Rocky5 - 2009-10-02 17:51 How do i set the windowed window size as each time i launch XBMC it reverts back to 720x600 or something like that i need it to stay at 1280x720 (or even be set to that as currently i have to manually drag it to that size and its inaccurate) so am currently on build Rev 22312 as this is like the old builds i can select 720p windowed and bamn its the right size i need and windowed. any help would be great thank you also note i tried changing the resolution in the guisettings.xml for windowed but again it reverts back. - kricker - 2009-10-02 18:11 Rocky5 Wrote:How do i set the windowed window size as each time i launch XBMC it reverts back to 720x600 or something like that i need it to stay at 1280x720 (or even be set to that as currently i have to manually drag it to that size and its inaccurate)Currently you can't. It is a known issue. |