![]() |
|
JSON-RPC (JSON Remote Procedure Call) interface protocol in development for XBMC - Printable Version +- XBMC Community Forum (http://forum.xbmc.org) +-- Forum: Development (/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +--- Forum: Development (/forumdisplay.php?fid=93) +---- Forum: JSON-RPC (/forumdisplay.php?fid=174) +---- Thread: JSON-RPC (JSON Remote Procedure Call) interface protocol in development for XBMC (/showthread.php?tid=68263) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 |
- Montellese - 2012-02-16 17:21 JSON-RPC does not yet provide any filtering functionality but once that's possible I'm sure scripts like watchlist can be improved to only fetch as much data through JSON-RPC as necessary. JSON-RPC is still very young but it's contantly growing (once the feature freeze is over ).But still things can only be optimised so much and people have to keep and mind that a low-end device like an ATV2, an iPad and most embedded devices (compared to a normal computer) does not provide as much power as other systems do. Every system has a drawback, one has a fast boot-time but not much ponies and the other has a longer boot-time but enough power to handle anything you throw at it. - bthusby - 2012-02-16 23:26 Montellese Wrote:JSON-RPC does not yet provide any filtering functionality but once that's possible I'm sure scripts like watchlist can be improved to only fetch as much data through JSON-RPC as necessary. JSON-RPC is still very young but it's contantly growing (once the feature freeze is over Thanks for answer. Yes, I understand that the ATV2 is a light weight box, and I use it with the Quartz skin which is brilliant for low performance purposes. I'm looking forward to the natural evolution of more optimal code for handling Libraries / DB queries and parsing of filtered JSON-RPC in the future. In my opinion this is core functionality that should be made absolutely as efficient as possible
- doozer - 2012-02-17 09:07 Will future releases notify the user when changes are made to the playlist, or did I miss something in the docs? Something like Playlist.OnUpdate perhaps? - Montellese - 2012-02-17 09:59 Something like this will be available once the whole playlist handling has been refactored inside XBMC. Currently there are too many entry points to cover. - Montellese - 2012-02-17 11:46 Tolriq Wrote:About this ticket Please add a feature request ticket for this. I can't guarantee though that it will ever be added because I think it will make people lazy and nobody will ever care to check Player.GetActivePlayers() before calling Player.PlayPause() so it is very likely to be "abused". - Tolriq - 2012-02-17 12:34 Ticket added : http://trac.xbmc.org/ticket/12663 As long as the id does not change, we can batch the pause for id 1 and 2, but this is just another way to abuse the system ![]() Instead of id -1 I've think about just adding a new command like PlayPauseAll so we don't allow -1 only on some commands and people get lost. Just a special command for special cases. - Mizaki - 2012-02-18 21:57 Am I miss understanding limits or is it +1 on the total and end? On movies for example: Code: { end=597, start=0, total=597 }- Montellese - 2012-02-18 22:26 It's probably more that the name "end" is a bit confusing and the fact that indices always start at 0 in computing so the last element is size -1 (or total - 1). It means something like "size" but not with the same meaning as the "total" property. "total" tells you how many items there are if you would not limit the list. "end" tells you how many items there are in the list that is part of the response. I'll probably add a description to the "end" property to make it easier to understand. - Mizaki - 2012-02-18 23:00 Okay, thanks. I could understand the total starting from 1 but as "start" starts from 0 I was expecting "end" to end 596. - Montellese - 2012-02-18 23:02 Yeah like I said the naming choice "end" is not very good but it has been there since the beginning of JSON-RPC. |