Should I use a mapped network drive or actual network location on WHS??? - Printable Version +- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +--- Forum: General Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=111) +---- Forum: Windows (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +---- Thread: Should I use a mapped network drive or actual network location on WHS??? (/showthread.php?tid=72420) |
Should I use a mapped network drive or actual network location on WHS??? - nrk7001 - 2010-04-19 May be a real noob question, but I was curious to know what method may be more efficient and responsive in terms of using a Windows Home Server. I map the shares as a network drive on my local PC's for easy access, and I noticed on XBMC, I can either add a SMB network location or add the local drive that I already mapped. They both point to the same location on the server, but was wondering if there was an advantage (ie: caching or speed) by using one over the other. My assumption is that the mapped network drive route would be a bit quicker, but this is an uneducated guess. Thoughts? - bionic1234 - 2010-04-19 My personal preference has been smb + IP address instead of hostname + shared folder for speed and resilience. - nrk7001 - 2010-04-20 I have been using the network location and it seems like it takes a while to refresh each time or when I try to add. I will try the IP + SMB and report back. |