![]() |
|
[LINUX] Apple TV Crystalbuntu (Ubuntu Linux and Crystal HD) Disk Image for Apple TV - Printable Version +- XBMC Community Forum (http://forum.xbmc.org) +-- Forum: Help and Support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +--- Forum: XBMC General Help and Support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=111) +---- Forum: Linux and Live support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=52) +---- Thread: [LINUX] Apple TV Crystalbuntu (Ubuntu Linux and Crystal HD) Disk Image for Apple TV (/showthread.php?tid=74992) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 |
- scorneil - 2010-06-08 16:18 dafranca Wrote:just need to add this line to you will need to install an ubuntu afp client first like this one http://sites.google.com/site/alexthepuffin/home - dafranca - 2010-06-08 16:27 scorneil Wrote:you will need to install an ubuntu afp client first Just need netatalk: sudo apt-get install netatalk - brock_gonad - 2010-06-08 16:29 Sam.Nazarko Wrote:So unmount it: Thanks Sam. Indeed, fsck.hfsplus was what I needed. FWIW, I couldn't mount with -o as you show above, I just snipped that argument out and it worked. Now I can boot off of the hard drive, dig in. Thanks! - lalaw - 2010-06-08 16:42 pin87a Wrote:Sam has nicely offered to host a minimal xbmcbuntu image for the ATV that I put together. It's very similar to Sam's except that it's based on a minimal install (no ubuntu desktop) and it uses the xbmc-live package to handle the xbmc autostart stuff (it also restarts xbmc automatically if it crashes). This is great stuff. Really exciting to see all the development going on. Are there any advantages to using the minimal image from a performance standpoint? Or is it mainly for the sake of saving disk space? - Angrenost - 2010-06-08 17:08 dafranca Wrote:Just need netatalk: Ok i will try but i have another problem to solve first. Maybe stupid question but it's stucking me. I always used Terminal or Fugu to acces and modify my Appletv but in the linux boot i am unable. Instead of ssh frontrow@myappletvip i am trying: ssh xbmc@myappletvip as xbmc is now the new user and password but the response after some wait is always: "ssh: connect to host 10.0.1.2 port 22: Operation timed out" Via Fugu the same,too bad! The IP is unchanged in the Frontrow side,in Linux should be the same,right? - scorneil - 2010-06-08 17:38 Angrenost Wrote:Ok i will try but i have another problem to solve first. you have probably been assigned a different IP address. check your router logs to see what IP was assigned. No network connectivity - frumpy_uk - 2010-06-08 17:54 Using the minimal image, I am not getting any network connectivity. Based on the system info from within xbmc, it's looking for an IP address in the range 192.168.1.x however my router is on 192.168.0.1 (and the DHCP server is serving addresses in 192.168.0.100 - 192.168.0.254). Do I have to change my router setup or can I do something to the image/in xbmc? thanks in advance - Angrenost - 2010-06-08 18:11 scorneil Wrote:you have probably been assigned a different IP address. check your router logs to see what IP was assigned. Wohooo... yes you are right! Thank you! - pin87a - 2010-06-08 18:17 frumpy_uk Wrote:Using the minimal image, I am not getting any network connectivity. Based on the system info from within xbmc, it's looking for an IP address in the range 192.168.1.x however my router is on 192.168.0.1 (and the DHCP server is serving addresses in 192.168.0.100 - 192.168.0.254). Do I have to change my router setup or can I do something to the image/in xbmc? Hmm.. it's setup for DHCP so it should 'just work,' but maybe I did something wrong.. will check on that tonight. - pin87a - 2010-06-08 18:21 lalaw Wrote:This is great stuff. Really exciting to see all the development going on. Are there any advantages to using the minimal image from a performance standpoint? Or is it mainly for the sake of saving disk space? It's mostly for a performance advantage (and probably not a big one at that). There are less services running (and no desktop) so startup time is quicker. XBMC is also configured to restart if it crashes instead of dropping to a terminal (thanks to xbmc-live). Probably uses a few hundred megabytes less diskspace (not a big enough difference to get excited about). |