(2012-06-19, 22:04)ruuk Wrote: Well, I'm still not sure why some forums were added to the online DB with no names, but I added some code to the online DB that extracts the name from the url if it isn't there.
If anyone has any issues, let me know.
Who do I think I'm kidding. Hasselhof, if you have any issues let me know

**ruuk listens to empty sounding echoes**

(2012-06-19, 23:23)hasselhof Wrote:

(2012-06-19, 22:04)ruuk Wrote: Well, I'm still not sure why some forums were added to the online DB with no names, but I added some code to the online DB that extracts the name from the url if it isn't there.
If anyone has any issues, let me know.
Who do I think I'm kidding. Hasselhof, if you have any issues let me know

**ruuk listens to empty sounding echoes**

I I I will will will let let let you you know know

---

Hi ruuk

I've just checked my subscriptions and had two updates,
am I right in saying that the new updates should be bold and rise to the top of the list?
One of the subscription updates rose to the top of the list and was bold, and one was bold but about 6th in the list.

(2012-06-19, 23:52)hasselhof Wrote: I was going to ask for a purge of local list feature, useful to get rid of the doulble entries that appear in my local list,
but maybe that should stop now the www etc have been taken off the descriptions.

(2012-06-21, 20:40)ruuk Wrote:

(2012-06-19, 23:52)hasselhof Wrote: I was going to ask for a purge of local list feature, useful to get rid of the doulble entries that appear in my local list,
but maybe that should stop now the www etc have been taken off the descriptions.

Yeah, that should be cleared up. I'd like to avoid any code that clears duplicates if possible, and just try to make FB not make them in the first place. Hopefully that's how it will work from now on

I just got a pm from Abrasher, (i'm on my phone at the moment, camping in the olympic mountains, and can't remember his xbmchub name) and it looks like he's going ahead with getting Forum Browser represented there.

I suppose it will be nice to get it in the hands of more people, considering how much work i've put into it. The addon i've written that has the most users would have to be Facebook Media (Facebook says there are around 24,000 users who've activated it), but i've put many times more work into Forum Browser.

Well, I guess I'll get back to waiting for my wife and daughter to get out of the store while I sit and keep the dog company

(2012-06-22, 14:38)hasselhof Wrote: Hi ruuk,

I've just took a look at xbmchub's fusion easy addon installer, I don't know if your aware of it, but it's xbmchub's repo if you like
which you set up via file manager in xbmc, inside this is a new link to forum browser, but it is currently pointing to your older google code page
v 0.9.1.5. of forum browser. I've given umOuch[INKMD] a PM to point him to your repo, but I've also told him to ignore the PM
if that's what you had instructed him to do ie v 0.9.1.5. . There currently is no more evidence of forum browser on xbmc.hub as of yet.

(2012-06-23, 15:51)hasselhof Wrote: Hi ruuk

did you get your PM, or maybe you havn't time

John

(2012-06-23, 21:12)hasselhof Wrote: Hi ruuk,

seems to be a problem with Boxee see log

Boxee in a browser works fine

log for boxee