+- XBMC Community Forum (http://forum.xbmc.org)
+-- Forum: Help and Support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+--- Forum: Skin Help and Support (/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+---- Forum: Artwork packs (/forumdisplay.php?fid=71)
+---- Thread: fanart.tv - Request and share ClearLOGO, ClearART and more Fan Artwork / Thumbs (/showthread.php?tid=87577)
- NeoRame - 2011-04-08 14:50
take a look at my PSD and you see what layer style i used Oo and your blury shit happends when you raster the vector and perfect align at the bottum... but ok for i create a not original looking version for you.... -_-
- hikaricore - 2011-04-08 16:20
NeoRame Wrote:take a look at my PSD and you see what layer style i used Oo and your blury shit happends when you raster the vector and perfect align at the bottum... but ok for i create a not original looking version for you.... -_-
Your vector should be sized properly before you convert it to an image, then you won't get the blur or the compression artifacts. Aligning an image has no effect on its quality, if you really think that then I have no idea what to tell you.
- NeoRame - 2011-04-13 07:15
just for info "liamg" copied my "the kennedys" logo. for proof i can sent you my psd if you want
and i think you guys need more mods, since one week no new applies/ denies.
kind regards
NeoRame
- hikaricore - 2011-04-15 01:37
Been busy lately, not too concerned with logos every single day.
I'll go through them when I can but it seems I'm about the only one doing it now.
Is it just my imagination or is BlueNZ resubmitting every shitty logo we've ever denied without making any changes to them?
I don't even know how to begin to deal with this so I could use some input on my theory.
*edit*
Actually I found a couple that may have been edited, but a large majority of them were jagged/pixelated/blurry/overcropped garbage.
- NeoRame - 2011-04-15 07:22
it's not only your imagination i noticed it too. that`s why i rework/create some of his stuff to give some "good" ones to your site...
btw, is it possible to get an option to delete denied pictures? (because i uploded "Parker Lewis" twice. one of it was apply the other lies around my account.)
and if it possible to get an uploaded section for users so i can see what images i uploaded?
kind regards
NeoRame
Edit:
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1228/unbenannt2sn.png
- Kode - 2011-04-15 12:49
NeoRame Wrote:btw, is it possible to get an option to delete denied pictures? (because i uploded "Parker Lewis" twice. one of it was apply the other lies around my account.)
and if it possible to get an uploaded section for users so i can see what images i uploaded?
Mods actually have the ability to delete rather than deny images, but allowing users to delete their denied images might not be a bad idea.
I gave the source to someone who wanted to help get involved with new features so have been waiting to see what comes of that before continuing development, but he seems to have gone MIA.
I've also been looking for help from some designers as my signature suggests, so far zero response.
Would also like some tutorials done that I can put on the site to help people who want to get involved, including what will and wont be accepted, what is borderline, why it will get rejected, what could be done to improve it.
When the only people really helping out are hikaricore and MarkAsRead (though I just went to the denied list and the majority is hikaricore, and the latest approved is all hikaricore) it's a little hard to get enthused about adding new features when the current site for the most part works fine as is.
Hopefully though, when my new laptop is set up, I will be adding some new features, so stay tuned.
BlueNZ checking in - BlueNZ - 2011-04-19 18:16
Sup guys good to finally chat with you guys. Sorry for not getting on the forums sooner but I try and stay off message boards and social networking sites.
Hikari - Just wanted to explain that the old stuff I resubmitted had the corrections (noted when denied) and checked to make sure they weren't fixed and resubmitted before I redid them. Most were incorrect alignment and I didn't even bother with the general "not high enough quality" denied ones. Sorry if that was annoying to you, was just helping out with filling some holes since the original submitters seemed to grump off.
Neo - Haha, mate. Do your own work, I can fix and resubmit my own stuff! Keep in mind that I just started doing these a couple weeks ago so still learning but getting better every day
That said, I added a shadow to your Kennedy logo which was missing (IMO) and submitted it which I'd like to apologize for, I didn't know how to contact you before.Kode - good work so far I know it's a hell of a lot of work. I'm doing web design at the mo so I'll help you out where and when I can.
- BlueNZ - 2011-04-19 18:23
NeoRame Wrote:it's not only your imagination i noticed it too. that`s why i rework/create some of his stuff to give some "good" ones to your site...Can I please get credit for the BBC WW2 (without BBC logo), Nick Swardson's Pretend Time and Teen Wolf please? Wasn't even given a chance to fix and resubmit before he grabbed mine, reworked them and submitted them as his own.
dannycorker Wrote:Anyone fancy doing the Walking With Beasts logo for me? Been sat at the top of the requests for 42 days nowDanny, third try going through now. The problem is there isn't any high qual logos to work with so you can only do so much. I've done a careful trace but still had issues with the smaller letters so I've redone them pixel by pixel and hoping it makes it this time through...
- NeoRame - 2011-04-20 09:38
i dont reworked this stuff i create it totally new! most of my stuff are vector shapes or font layer Oo
- BlueNZ - 2011-04-20 10:01
NeoRame Wrote:i dont reworked this stuff i create it totally new! most of my stuff are vector shapes or font layer OoI just quoted you admitting that you reworked them and they were submitted within hours of mine being denied. That's one heck of a coincidence!