2012-09-11, 21:15
(2012-09-11, 10:57)ezechiel1917 Wrote: I've used this modeline on several setups and it works great. It's more accurate than EIA-CEA one (74.175 pc) and most accurate working 23.976 modeline I've found, also it works better for me on some displays.. No more missed frames and 24p perfectly fluid. If you're happy with the standard one (23.97576) you don't need to change it, otherwise it's definitely worth a try.
(2012-09-11, 03:58)Hack_kid Wrote:(2012-09-08, 15:02)ezechiel1917 Wrote: 1080p 23.97610 Hz modeline:
Code:ModeLine "1920x1080_23.976" 74.230 1920 2560 2604 2752 1080 1084 1089 1125 +hsync +vsync
OK wait....should we use this modeline or the other one this is closer to 23.976 also will this flux my out of sync issues with some 23.976 material? I'm using recent GIT
(2012-09-11, 07:37)FernetMenta Wrote: Would have been nice if ezechiel1917 posted why he thinks that this is correct.
I would rather use the EIA-CEA standard which is the one I have posted. See Table 4: http://read.pudn.com/downloads122/ebook/...-861-B.pdf It has a pixel clock of 74.175
a/v sync is a different story.
Did this six a/v sync issues with you or no? Also what is the point of sync playback to display being on? If we have refresh rate switching wouldn't sync playback be redundant. Sorry these are all questions I've had for years just never had the right Peron to ask