Posts: 5
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation:
0
2014-10-18, 23:03
(This post was last modified: 2014-10-18, 23:15 by Loicvan.)
Just trying to install openelec and even though I see the menu with sandisk ssd and my usb key, esc does nothing and then it wants to start from the internal ssd. I even tried different keyboards. Why can't I choose the usb key to boot (I tried several keys too)? the bios is SeaBIOS 20141016 from Matt. It just doesn't wait at all and try to boot right away from the ssd, and hangs.
Posts: 5
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation:
0
OK, I was able to get it by pressing 2 right after escape, for some reason it wouldn't wait for me to choose otherwise. All is good. Sorry Matt.
Posts: 333
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
2014-10-22, 03:05
(This post was last modified: 2014-10-22, 03:08 by Scott R.)
Just got pointed over to the ChromeBox so I'm a noob on this subject. Just curious if anyone here is familiar with the old Acer Revo 1600 nettop boxes (Intel ATOM / NVIDIA ION) and can tell me in what areas the ChromeBox would offer a real world improvement. I started up threads about the Revo 1600 a long time ago and experimented with Windows XP and Windows 7, and upgraded the RAM on it. I eventually settled on an OpenElec install on the one I use in my living room for streaming full-bitrate Blu-ray rips. But I found it to be too slow to try to run Windows 7 Media Center on, and I still wish I could more easily play Netflix and other apps like that on it, so I pretty much use it in conjunction with either an Apple TV or Amazon Fire TV, and and Xbox 360 (for live TV / PVR - I use Windows Media Center and Plex Media Server on a central server).
Posts: 19,982
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
451
nickr
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 19,982
2014-10-22, 04:10
(This post was last modified: 2014-10-22, 04:16 by nickr.)
I have a revo 1600 and two revo 3700's. The 1600 is pretty slow - single core. The ION chipset in it is also inferior in some aspects to the ION2 chipset in the 3700's.
The 1600 is in my stepson's room (can't recall what he did to deserve that). I haven't used it myself for ages, in fact the room of a 15 year old male is too repulsive to contemplate.
You'll find a CB much faster through the menus and stuff, that aspect is pretty well governed by the CPU and the 2955 in a CB is far superior to the single core Atom in a Revo 1600.
As for playback, the ION hardware is very good under linux (incl openelec of course) and is hard to beat. But I have a celeron 1037u which is inferior to the 2955, and it works very well. Maybe my eyes are too tired, but it looks as good as the ION2 stuff to me.
TL;DR - I think it will be an improvement for you!
I have no experience with windows with any of these platforms, but get at least 4G RAM if you want windows. There is another thread here somewhere about windows on CB.
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Posts: 245
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation:
0
aaronb
Senior Member
Posts: 245
I've been using a 2010 Mac Mini for a few years, but have thought about trying a Chromebox. In the heavier skins I get a little bit of lag scrolling through movies with fanart, nothing excessive, but just enough that I thought maybe I should get something newer and I like to tinker anyways, and the Mac Minis have good resale value.
I googled the comparison between the Core 2 Duo in my Mac vs the Celeron 2955 and they were nearly identical in benchmarking, with the C2D coming out just ever so slightly ahead. That made me think maybe it's not worth it. Will the superior Haswell graphics (Mini has Geforce 320M) play a role in speeding it up? With a skin like Aeon Nox is browsing the library as snappy as it gets?
Posts: 4,512
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation:
224
FWIW, I've tested many of the common skins, including Aeon Nox, and have never had a single bit of lag or slowdown. Benchmarks are just that, and these Haswell chips are a lot faster than the old Core2 architecture, regardless of what benchmarks say. My old setup was a C2D + Nvidia GT210, and the ChromeBox is faster/better in every aspect.