This is probobly going to be the best HTPC when its released!

  Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Reply
gobba Offline
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 0
Post: #1
If it does what they say and for that price its unbeatable!

Thoughts?

Specs taken from the Homepage:

Quote: 700MHz ARM11
128MB of SDRAM
OpenGL ES 2.0
1080p30 H.264 high-profile decode
Composite and HDMI video output
USB 2.0
SD/MMC/SDIO memory card slot
General-purpose I/O
Open software (Ubuntu, Iceweasel, KOffice, Python)


http://bit.ly/jyBFNY

-gob
find quote
T800 Offline
Posting Freak
Posts: 800
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 5
Post: #2
Look good.

Best is a bit much though. Small and capable more like it.

Living Room i3 • W7 Ultimate x64 • 120GB SSD • HD 7750 • 2x TBS8922 tuners • Aeon Nox 4.0
Bedroom A6 3500 • W7 Ultimate x64 • 40GB SSD • HD 6550 • Aeon Nox 4.0
Servers unRAID server for Movies (22TB) • unRAID server for TV Shows/Music (11TB)
HTPC http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=99831
unRAID Server http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=106786
find quote
gobba Offline
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 0
Post: #3
well not best performance, but aslong as you can play 1080p movies you wouldnt need any more performance. And of that price..

-gob
find quote
T800 Offline
Posting Freak
Posts: 800
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 5
Post: #4
Performance can make the general user experience better with more to it than just being able to play the video. My AppleTV can play some 1080p files but the extra performance my HTPC gives me is the worth the extra effort/money.

1080p movies can range from a 2GB poorly encoded file to a 40GB high bitrate uncompressed blu-ray rip with HD audio.

I do agree that a cheap device that small that can work as a semi-decent HTPC is good.

Living Room i3 • W7 Ultimate x64 • 120GB SSD • HD 7750 • 2x TBS8922 tuners • Aeon Nox 4.0
Bedroom A6 3500 • W7 Ultimate x64 • 40GB SSD • HD 6550 • Aeon Nox 4.0
Servers unRAID server for Movies (22TB) • unRAID server for TV Shows/Music (11TB)
HTPC http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=99831
unRAID Server http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=106786
find quote
topfs2 Offline
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 3,825
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 8
Post: #5
Just because it has support for opengl es 2 doesn't mean it can do our interface. Xbmc is quite heavy to render as is. My bet is if its retailing at $25 its at most as powerful as the beagle c4 (and even that is unlikely) the beagle c4 can't power normal skins at 720. So yes it might be perfect for mplayer and lxde, doubtful for xbmc.

Without real specs its impossible to say.

Cheers,
Tobias

If you have problems please read this before posting

Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting.
Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules.
For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first.


[Image: badge.gif]

"Well Im gonna download the code and look at it a bit but I'm certainly not a really good C/C++ programer but I'd help as much as I can, I mostly write in C#."
find quote
ebenupton Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 0
Post: #6
Hi. Can you give me an idea of how much CPU grunt you need to run your skins? We have somebody looking into porting XBMC once we get our next batch of prototypes back, and I'd like to know if it's remotely feasible.

To give you a (very, very) rough idea of the GPU performance, we run common shader-heavy benchmarks at roughly 3x the speed of an OMAP 4430.

Cheers

Eben Upton
Director, Raspberry Pi Foundation

http://www.raspberrypi.org
find quote
outatouch0 Offline
Fan
Posts: 626
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation: 3
Location: NC - USA
Post: #7
you could always download it yourself and test it Wink
find quote
wipmonkey Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 29
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 0
Post: #8
I take it the work trying to get XBMC working with beagleboard as seen in "working with dirty regions" never got too far?

And the SoC is Broadcom BCM2835 according to http://www.raspberrypi.org if that helps.


topfs2 Wrote:Just because it has support for opengl es 2 doesn't mean it can do our interface. Xbmc is quite heavy to render as is. My bet is if its retailing at $25 its at most as powerful as the beagle c4 (and even that is unlikely) the beagle c4 can't power normal skins at 720. So yes it might be perfect for mplayer and lxde, doubtful for xbmc.

Without real specs its impossible to say.

Cheers,
Tobias
find quote
bluray Offline
Posting Freak
Posts: 7,575
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 139
Post: #9
ebenupton Wrote:Hi. Can you give me an idea of how much CPU grunt you need to run your skins? We have somebody looking into porting XBMC once we get our next batch of prototypes back, and I'd like to know if it's remotely feasible.

To give you a (very, very) rough idea of the GPU performance, we run common shader-heavy benchmarks at roughly 3x the speed of an OMAP 4430.

Cheers

Eben Upton
Director, Raspberry Pi Foundation

http://www.raspberrypi.org
well- if it can playback bd iso in 1080P with dts-hd/truehd using two hd playback options in my signatures, i'll say that it is ready for the market.

>Alienware X51- do it all HTPC
>Simplify XBMC configurations
>HOW-TO Bitstreaming using XBMC
I refused to watch movie without bitstreaming HD audio!
find quote
eskro Offline
Posting Freak
Posts: 8,236
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 156
Post: #10
+1 bluray
find quote
Post Reply