2011-12-01, 23:54
If I use DSPlayer with 3840x1080 files I don't have DXVA...it is normal?
Regards!
Regards!
craigd Wrote:edit the scrapers content type to use foldernames for lookups
astute Wrote:Full SBS and half SBS work fine on my XBMC with my Sony LCD but would it be fair to assume that playing back Full SBS would be the same quality as half SBS on these players.
As XBMC basically scales the massive Full SBS back down to max 1920 width, which the TV then again splits to create the 3D picture.
Maybe Full SBS creates even a lower quality picture then Half SBS because the player also originally interprets the aspect ratio wrongly (to fit the too wide video) which then has to be rescaled to fit the by the TV splitted picture. Costing more power processing the larger file and scaling it.
Would the only way to achieve full HD 3D to be for XBMC to generate a combined stereo-scopic picture through frame-packing or OpenGL stereoscopic using HDMI1.4?
Hence the TV will then be able to handle the odd wide resolution and combine 2x1920x1080 instead split 1x1080x1920.
r4nd0m Wrote:bluray support can be achieved with plugin.makemkvbluray however this doesnt identify the 3d content nor does xbmc support 3d directly ...
same about full 3d sbs from my experience, couldnt find a device playing it perfectly ... so basically the only option seems to be converting to 3d half sbs mkv and play them wich play perfectly, however with a lesser resolution than full 3d sbs ...
SofaKng Wrote:Those of you playing "Full SBS" are only getting 1080p output to your TV. For true 3D HD output the video card needs to encode the content into a supported HDMI 1.4 format such as frame-packing, etc.
tocinillo Wrote:If I use DSPlayer with 3840x1080 files I don't have DXVA...it is normal?
Regards!
astute Wrote:Full SBS and half SBS work fine on my XBMC with my Sony LCD but would it be fair to assume that playing back Full SBS would be the same quality as half SBS on these players.
As XBMC basically scales the massive Full SBS back down to max 1920 width, which the TV then again splits to create the 3D picture.
Maybe Full SBS creates even a lower quality picture then Half SBS because the player also originally interprets the aspect ratio wrongly (to fit the too wide video) which then has to be rescaled to fit the by the TV splitted picture. Costing more power processing the larger file and scaling it.
Would the only way to achieve full HD 3D to be for XBMC to generate a combined stereo-scopic picture through frame-packing or OpenGL stereoscopic using HDMI1.4?
Hence the TV will then be able to handle the odd wide resolution and combine 2x1920x1080 instead split 1x1080x1920.
tocinillo Wrote:Same problem...
So, With Full SBS the only option to view it correctly is with "stretch to 16:9" option enabled, but in that case when I select on my Tv "side by side" 3D...is not 1920x1080 for each eye, yes Is that correct?
Thanks
liquidskin76 Wrote:XBMC will scale the 3840 width down to 1920. You then want to be using the 'Pixel Ratio' to scale it back it out to 1080 height.
You'll then be getting 1920x1080 to each eye. It will also retain the original aspect ratio of the movie.
Don't worry about the scaling, it won't destroy the quality.
Cheers
P.S. I'm using dsplayer and lav filters to view my Full SBS files. XBMC natively won't flawlessly play them. Half SBS it manages fine.
r4nd0m Wrote:interesting statement, I have checked a full sbs file natively on my Samsung D7000 unfortunately the internal player doesnt support the resolution, regarding xbmc however I am pretty sure it wont do the packaging for full 3d sbs correctly which is required and is done by other software players ...
but still a 3840 scaled down to 1920 and then re-scaled still isnt properly packaged over hdmi from xbmc itself ... dont know for other player for linux supporting this so could not check ...
liquidskin76 Wrote:Hmmm... what do you mean by 'packaged'?
If you mean XBMC should just display the 3840x1080 image as 1920x1080, then you're right, it's not handling it correctly (dsplayer included!) It shouldn't be scaled down in height like it does (therefore requiring rescaling back up in height).
I was under the impression that software players like stereoscopic player just took the 3840x1080 image and rescaled it to fit the screen, as it still displays as a side-by-side image, not a single frame (before you switch the TV to SBS 3D)?
However in terms of pixels, you're still seeing 3840x1080, just squashed (so to speak) down. When the TV then displays each left/right frame, you're then seeing 1920x1080 per eye.
Cheers!