• 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5(current)
  • 6
  • 7
  • 46
XBMC on Raspberry Pi - Wonder if this will work out? (Historical Discussion Thread)
#61
Khivar Wrote:Oh my bad, thought it still used a mplayer fork. Same question though, will it be able to hardware decode on the Raspberry Pi ?

Of course, without hardware decode, these arm boxes are useless as they don't have the ponies to brute force software decode.

Khivar Wrote:Hmm are you sure ? Raspberry Pi is based on the BCM2835 SoC which integrates an ARM1176JZ-F processor which seems to be an ARM11 processor ( adding the fact that it has ARM11 in its name ).
http://www.arm.com/products/processors/c...rm1176.php

Edit : Well just saw there was a difference between ARMv7 and ARM7 so you must be right Wink

I'm very sure Smile I do have to compile code and the cross-compiler has to know which arm opcodes to use.
Reply
#62
Is there a release date on these things?
Image
Reply
#63
Looking fwd to this as well...not so much for home use though to be honest, however, this would make a killer portable, vehicle-based platform.

Extremely compact, portable and 100% solid-state so it should handle the more extreme temp variances well...I'm hoping.

Plus access to all the off-the-shelf XBMC remote controls, etc...tons of possibilities.
If I helped out pls give me a +

A bunch of XBMC instances, big-ass screen in the basement + a 20TB FreeBSD, ZFS server.
Reply
#64
davilla Wrote:Of course, without hardware decode, these arm boxes are useless as they don't have the ponies to brute force software decode.

For HD and for Blu-ray sure. I was asking because I didn't know if you were porting XBMC on the Raspberry Pi without hardware decoding support ( where it would only work with standard definition video like the Xbox ) or if you'd try to make the hardware decoding work. It's awesome that it will hardware decode ! By the way I saw that the GPU is hardware decoding H264 1080p, hope it would be fast enough for full Blu-ray decoding, and what about VC-1 ? Because if we can play only our H264 blu-ray that would be annoying Smile


davilla Wrote:I'm very sure Smile I do have to compile code and the cross-compiler has to know which arm opcodes to use.

Okay thanks, learned a thing today Wink
Reply
#65
This you should beat...

http://blog.roku.com/blog/2012/01/04/rok...ing_stick/
ATV2 4.3 8F455 Seas0npassed / XBMC 11
Samsung HT-P70 5.1 / Samsung WS-32Z419P
Reply
#66
macf1an Wrote:This you should beat...

http://blog.roku.com/blog/2012/01/04/rok...ing_stick/

I would not touch any roku crap with a ten-foot pole. This thing is crap, it's still a set-top-box but you plug it in instead of using a cable. What you lose is sd cards, USB, and hardline ethernet.
Reply
#67
Very excited about the possibilities of this.
Reply
#68
thethirdnut Wrote:Extremely compact, portable and 100% solid-state ....

Great, I can finally replace my vacuum tube computer! Big Grin
Reply
#69
davilla Wrote:XBMC magic is coming to a PI next to you Smile

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14341410/2011-12-26-100700.ogv

I haven't seen this one answered on the Raspberrypi forums, so maybe you can shed some light on it. What are these capable of from an HDMI sound standpoint? I am guessing they can't do DTS-MA or TrueHD audio, but don't know what kind of audio output they can do.
Reply
#70
So ... just out of curiosity, if I understand this, the CuBox ARM processor is better than RasPi's but it is all self-contained and perhaps less flexible than RasPi?
Reply
#71
The developer of the CuBox has already ported XBMC.

YouTube video demonstrating it
Github Sourcecode

It seems that in 2-5 years, embedded devices such as the CuBox and the RasPi will be everywhere and will make great little front-end clients.
Reply
#72
swasheck Wrote:So ... just out of curiosity, if I understand this, the CuBox ARM processor is better than RasPi's but it is all self-contained and perhaps less flexible than RasPi?

I think it's just a bit more capable, but also quite a lot more expensive. If the Pi was sold with a case around it I'm guessing it might cost about $35 to $40. So you'll pay more then twice as much. I think it's only worth it if you really want SPDIF and/or eSATA. I personally think the CuBox would be perfect if it would have analog audio output instead of the optical output. I use SPDIF myself, but these cheap devices are perfect for people less nerdy then I am. Most people I know don't have receivers with optical input.

I doubt the faster CPU will make much difference. I guess 1GB of RAM might make a lot of difference though.
I'm just guessing here. I have no actual experience to prove it.
Image

Please add to my reputation if you find my posts usefull (+/- button below posts)
Ubuntu 12.10 minimal XBMC auto-install script :: XBMControl :: Xbmc XBOX Skins :: XBMControl for Android :: Owner of Sudo Systems
Reply
#73
please, stay on topic. if you want to discuss other SoCs, take it to a new thread.
Reply
#74
Any chance of confirmation for VC-1 and MPEG 2 HW acceleration?

Also, I'm assuming bitstreaming is a pipe dream?
Living Room: ASUS Chromebox / OpeneElec 5 / Kodi 14.2
Bedroom: Amazon FireTV Stick / Kodi 14.2
Home Office: Amazon FireTV Stick / Kodi 14.2
Windows Server: Intel Core i3-2100T / 8GB Ram / 48TB / MySQL / StableBit DrivePool on Server 2012 R2 Standard
Reply
#75
davilla Wrote:please, stay on topic. if you want to discuss other SoCs, take it to a new thread.

sorry:o
Reply
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5(current)
  • 6
  • 7
  • 46

Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
XBMC on Raspberry Pi - Wonder if this will work out? (Historical Discussion Thread)11