Allwinner A10 : Is XBMC ported to MALI-400MP ?

  Thread Rating:
  • 14 Votes - 4.36 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Reply
j1nx Offline
Fan
Posts: 509
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 22
Location: Netherlands
Post: #21
And another comes on the market;
http://www.pineriver.cn/eshowProDetail.asp?ProID=1531
find quote
slicemaster Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 1
Post: #22
These A10 boxes are really starting to get popular! The size and look of that latest one is really intriguing, too bad it doesn't look like it has Ethernet...just WiFi...or does it have Ethernet? Not very clear from the page. Hopefully we'll get Linux + XBMC running on these A10 boxes soon. Decisions decisions....which A10 to get?
(This post was last modified: 2012-04-28 02:37 by slicemaster.)
find quote
slicemaster Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 1
Post: #23
just ran into this... The PCB is manufactured for use in a tablet but it's got all the necessarily connectors (doesn't have Ethernet but hey what do you expect in a pcb designed for tablet use) for use in a desktop/set-top implementation...for $27 (more than likely in volume) not bad....http://micdigi.com/2012/03/the-allwinner...-about-27/

similar product here: http://micdigi.com/2012/04/7-inch-a10-pc...on-screen/
(This post was last modified: 2012-04-28 02:58 by slicemaster.)
find quote
AZImmortal Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 0
Post: #24
It's been mentioned in this review that the refresh rate for the Mele A1000 is 61.9hz (check the last screenshot as well as the comments).

http://www.cnx-software.com/2012/04/08/m...nd-review/

Is this something that can be changed with some hackery?
find quote
davilla Offline
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 10,399
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 58
Post: #25
Showing 61.9hz refresh only mean they don't understand why vsync is important Smile

Only 1008 BogoMips ? my 900MHz amlogic is running around 1750


MediaInfo : http://mediainfo.sourceforge.net/
Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules.
find quote
AZImmortal Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 0
Post: #26
Excellent, I wasn't sure if the refresh rate was somehow locked down. If it can be easily changed, then I'll order a box right away.
find quote
bornagainpengui Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 2
Post: #27
(2012-04-28 02:50)slicemaster Wrote:  just ran into this... The PCB is manufactured for use in a tablet but it's got all the necessarily connectors (doesn't have Ethernet but hey what do you expect in a pcb designed for tablet use) for use in a desktop/set-top implementation...for $27 (more than likely in volume) not bad....http://micdigi.com/2012/03/the-allwinner...-about-27/

similar product here: http://micdigi.com/2012/04/7-inch-a10-pc...on-screen/

What I want to know is why can't someone start a kickstarter or something and customize one of these boards for an XBMC console to replace the old xbox as standard reference hardware?

I'm not a business guy, but I'd imagine quite a few of us would buy an officially supported settop box with the ability to do emulation games integrated into the system. (Bring your own roms obviously.) Of course there are some games available for XBMC already, the ankroid clone and the media triva come to mind...

And since Android already comes built for these boards, I wonder how hard it would be to get games running fullscreen from within the XBMC interface? Clearly I'm not a programmer either, so I don't know how hard it would be to do, but I imagine some of the work Canonical is doing with Ubuntu for smartphones would be instructive there?
find quote
welshblob Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 0
Post: #28
(2012-04-30 02:43)bornagainpengui Wrote:  
(2012-04-28 02:50)slicemaster Wrote:  just ran into this... The PCB is manufactured for use in a tablet but it's got all the necessarily connectors (doesn't have Ethernet but hey what do you expect in a pcb designed for tablet use) for use in a desktop/set-top implementation...for $27 (more than likely in volume) not bad....http://micdigi.com/2012/03/the-allwinner...-about-27/

similar product here: http://micdigi.com/2012/04/7-inch-a10-pc...on-screen/

What I want to know is why can't someone start a kickstarter or something and customize one of these boards for an XBMC console to replace the old xbox as standard reference hardware?

I'm not a business guy, but I'd imagine quite a few of us would buy an officially supported settop box with the ability to do emulation games integrated into the system. (Bring your own roms obviously.) Of course there are some games available for XBMC already, the ankroid clone and the media triva come to mind...

And since Android already comes built for these boards, I wonder how hard it would be to get games running fullscreen from within the XBMC interface? Clearly I'm not a programmer either, so I don't know how hard it would be to do, but I imagine some of the work Canonical is doing with Ubuntu for smartphones would be instructive there?

Given that these boxes are being manufactured already and new ones based on this chip seem to be released weekly then is there a need for a kickstarter project?
find quote
bornagainpengui Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 2
Post: #29
(2012-04-30 09:27)welshblob Wrote:  Given that these boxes are being manufactured already and new ones based on this chip seem to be released weekly then is there a need for a kickstarter project?

Because it's not about the hardware, it's about some sort of standardization and reference design. Think Boxee Box without the lock-in, then add Android games.

Right now everyone just kind of builds something or starts with an old pc sitting in the corner and installs XBMC. It works. It works better than any of us have any right to expect it to work, a testament to the ability of the developers here--but it never works 100% of the time due to strange hardware quirks and differences in configuration.

My thinking (as an enduser, not a programmer) is that if one set of hardware was chosen, then it could be targeted towards much more easily because the developers would have a common platform on which to work. Instead of trying to build something and hoping it will be "good enough" or buying a customer device like the AppleTV and hoping it can be hacked to doing what we want this would allow people to buy a finished box and plug it in. This would be a better deal for both group, those who want to tinker and those who want it to just work.

Like I said, I'm not a programmer so I'm probably missing all sorts of reasons why this is impractical and not likely to work. To me though this kind of thing just makes sense and I really don't understand why nothing like it hasn't happened already. I understand the reasoning behind not wanting to make a XBMC Wii, or an XBMC 360, or PS3 edition because there is no way to prevent the host company from wiping out your efforts with a firmware update. I've never understood why the XBMC team never sat down, talked amongst themselves and said "Hardware XYZ is what we will target and support with OS ABC and the amount of RAM 123, etc etc. XBMC may work on other hardware but this is what we recommend."

--bornagainpenguin
find quote
davilla Offline
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 10,399
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 58
Post: #30
we don't talk out loud Smile


MediaInfo : http://mediainfo.sourceforge.net/
Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules.
find quote
Post Reply