Lately I installed this script, and it's so good that I never want to live without it. Saves a lot of time updating&cleaning.
http://wiki.xbmc.org/index.php?title=Add...uto_Update
How about including it in a future version of XBMC?
Adding Library Auto Update?
Ferdi-T
Senior Member Posts: 102 Joined: Jul 2011 Reputation: 1 |
2012-08-08 12:20
Post: #1
|
| find quote |
Martijn
Team-XBMC Joined: Jul 2011 Reputation: 115 Location: Dawn of time |
2012-08-08 13:10
Post: #2
Why include this if there is an add-on?
Beside that there are some risks Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forums before posting. Do NOT e-mail Team-XBMC members asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules. For troubleshooting and bug reporting, make sure you read this first For your mediacenter artwork go to ![]() |
| find quote |
Ferdi-T
Senior Member Posts: 102 Joined: Jul 2011 Reputation: 1 |
2012-08-08 14:18
Post: #3
Well, basically because when I started using it it made me think: "this is how XBMC should work right out of the box". Plugins are by their nature something that you more or less stumble upon. Which is okay for a lot of plugins, but in this specific case it's something that I bet a lot of people would appreciate.
|
| find quote |
edrikk
Senior Member Posts: 106 Joined: Jul 2011 Reputation: 2 |
2012-08-09 04:10
Post: #4
I would 100% agree with that thought.
My parents run a HTPC, and as I didn't want to mess with plugins for them, I actually had windows reboot at 4 am to do a rescan.... Quick and dirty, but in all honesty, it would be great if XBMC just watched its folders.... |
| find quote |
Montellese
Team-XBMC Developer Joined: Jan 2009 Reputation: 20 Location: Switzerland |
2012-08-09 10:29
Post: #5
(2012-08-09 04:10)edrikk Wrote: I would 100% agree with that thought. Because as always it's sooooooo easy. Watching folders is basically only a real option for local drives (and even there it depends on the filesystem and the operating system being used). Anything that resides on a network share (or simply not on the same computer as XBMC) either requires special third party software (which again needs to be setup, configured and tested) or a polling behaviour which may not be such a good idea either depending on the type of source. Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting. Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules. For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first. ![]() |
| find quote |
Ned Scott
Team-XBMC Wiki Guy Posts: 12,566 Joined: Jan 2011 Reputation: 138 Location: Arizona, USA |
2012-08-09 10:32
Post: #6
There's another add-on that will watch folders and update the library when a new file is found: Add-on:Library watchdog
Which is another point of why these things aren't enabled by default; there's many options. Some people don't change/add content very often and don't want to do things like an automatic update. Some people shutdown and open up XBMC often and updating upon start up is enough for them, and additional auto updates wouldn't do anything more than wake a sleeping hard drive. Others use media/download managers that remotely trigger a library update after downloading a new file. You can make easy links to the XBMC wiki using double brackets around words: [[debug log]] = debug log, [[Add-on:YouTube]] = Add-on:YouTube, [[Adding videos to the library]] = Adding videos to the library, [[userdata]] = userdata, etc |
| find quote |
edrikk
Senior Member Posts: 106 Joined: Jul 2011 Reputation: 2 |
2012-08-10 17:12
Post: #7
(2012-08-09 10:29)Montellese Wrote:(2012-08-09 04:10)edrikk Wrote: I would 100% agree with that thought. ![]() You're 100% correct Montellese... I actually was simply referring to local disks... using inotify / FindFirstChangeNotification ... But you're absolutely right in (what I read to be) "it's better to not implement it, than implement it only for local disks, and have a million questions about 'why doesn't it work for me? I have my files sitting on ....'" |
| find quote |
HeresJohnny
Senior Member Posts: 133 Joined: Mar 2011 Reputation: 2 Location: Germany |
2012-08-10 17:26
Post: #8
Yup, I have my stuff on an external RAID encasing. If I forget to turn it on and XBMC starts scraping away, my shares might be wiped clean. Especially annoying because I've taken some time to fix music artist bios manually.
|
| find quote |
ghostelement
Fan Joined: Sep 2010 Reputation: 1 Location: Portland, Oregon |
2012-08-11 01:05
Post: #9
(2012-08-10 17:26)HeresJohnny Wrote: Yup, I have my stuff on an external RAID encasing. If I forget to turn it on and XBMC starts scraping away, my shares might be wiped clean. Especially annoying because I've taken some time to fix music artist bios manually. This is the biggest problem I have with the current setup. If for whatever reason my storage server decides to lock up or loose connectivity, my libraries get wiped out, and have to be rebuilt when the server comes back online. |
| find quote |
Live2Ride
Junior Member Posts: 18 Joined: Apr 2013 Reputation: 0 |
2013-04-14 13:35
Post: #10
(2012-08-10 17:26)HeresJohnny Wrote: Yup, I have my stuff on an external RAID encasing. If I forget to turn it on and XBMC starts scraping away, my shares might be wiped clean. Especially annoying because I've taken some time to fix music artist bios manually. I haven't thought about that.. Pure luck that my library haven't been wiped out. One solution for this would be that before auto cleaning should backup the databases. Maybe a future feature... |
| find quote |

![[Image: fanarttv.png]](http://trakt.us/images/thanks/fanarttv.png)

![[Image: badge.gif]](http://www.ohloh.net/projects/9132/badge.gif)

![[Image: tgdb-buttonlogosmall.png]](http://thegamesdb.net/images/tgdb-buttonlogosmall.png)
Search
Help