Extending new generated api

takoi · 2012-09-29 17:38

Are there any plans on supporting fields? I mean I can wrap my 10 fields in methods no problem, but is that something you would accept in a patch?

**jfcarroll** · 2012-09-29 22:45

You can do read-only fields (constants) now. I am actually going to add fields. Yes. I'm just not sure when. For the time being I'd suggest wrapping them in getters and setters.

takoi · 2012-09-30 13:15

I meant fields as in class members. You saying you can already can do that? How?

**Montellese** · 2012-09-30 13:18

Nope it's not yet possible but we plan to add it.

takoi Fan Posts: 503 Joined: Oct 2009 Reputation: 6 Location: Norway	2012-09-29 17:38 Post: #11 Are there any plans on supporting fields? I mean I can wrap my 10 fields in methods no problem, but is that something you would accept in a patch?
	find quote

jfcarroll Team-XBMC Developer Posts: 392 Joined: Dec 2006 Reputation: 2 Location: Philadelphia area, US	2012-09-29 22:45 Post: #12 You can do read-only fields (constants) now. I am actually going to add fields. Yes. I'm just not sure when. For the time being I'd suggest wrapping them in getters and setters.
	find quote

takoi Fan Posts: 503 Joined: Oct 2009 Reputation: 6 Location: Norway	2012-09-30 13:15 Post: #13 I meant fields as in class members. You saying you can already can do that? How?
	find quote

Montellese Team-XBMC Developer Posts: 2,778 Joined: Jan 2009 Reputation: 20 Location: Switzerland	2012-09-30 13:18 Post: #14 Nope it's not yet possible but we plan to add it. Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting. Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules. For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first.
	find quote