Posts: 32
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
0
jskube
Junior Member
Posts: 32
2013-01-11, 20:21
(This post was last modified: 2013-01-11, 20:21 by jskube.)
Is there a reason you don't want to use mythtv? I only ask because channel changes are down to about 4 seconds these days, it is rock solid, and it isn't nearly as bad to setup as some people make it out to be.
Posts: 3,641
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
57
bry
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 3,641
Probably the process of getting everything working
first_time_user (wiki) |
free content (wiki) |
forum rules (wiki) |
PVR (wiki) |
Debug Log (wiki)
IMPORTANT:
The official Kodi version does not contain any content what so ever. This means that you should provide your own content from a local or remote storage location, DVD, Blu-Ray or any other media carrier that you own. Additionally Kodi allows you to install third-party plugins that may provide access to content that is freely available on the official content provider website. The watching or listening of illegal or pirated content which would otherwise need to be paid for is not endorsed or approved by Team Kodi.
Posts: 24
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation:
1
You still need a backend process to download guide data and store channel lineup/recordings/etc. Then on top of that you would need the XBMC plugin to connect to that process. Sure, you could combine them but in essence it's still doing the same thing - basically what MythTV is already doing. So, there is not a whole lot of motivation to reinvent the wheel for a specific situation. Don't get me wrong, I would love to see the HDHomeRun get some love. I think the biggest hurdle right now is that both the DLNA support in HDHomeRun and the PVR support in XBMC are not officially released.
I'm currently using MythTV and haven't really had many problems. I only really change channels by going to the guide and I don't really ever seen channels taking more than a few seconds to load. It doesn't really seem any different than a cable box, really. Only issues I have are a lack of "previous channel" button and it occasionally stutters at the end of a program as it is starting a new recording. I'm assuming that is because I'm using pretty crappy hardware (atom/laptop hdd) for the MythTV box, though.
Posts: 19,982
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
451
nickr
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 19,982
Hdhr will work with tvheadend so problem solved.
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Posts: 253
Joined: Dec 2010
Is there a walk through on how to get tvheadend to work with the hdhomerun prime?
I've never been successful in getting it to find any channels
Posts: 23
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
0
For what it's worth I like this idea. When I use a backend (I've tried TVHeadend, MythTV, and NextPVR) my image gets choppy and buffers and stutters. It's impossible to watch. As soon as I used the beta firmware on the HDHR for the DLNA, it plays amazingly. The only thing that stinks is not having an EPG. I don't even want recording. Just an EPG so I (gf really) knows whats on. I dont care about time shifting or recording on the XBMC frontends. Just want an EPG...
Posts: 24
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation:
0
I too would love it if hdhr would work with XBMC, if even just for the live tv and EPG. I've spent hours and hours trying to get hdhr working with mythtv and npvr. They just aren't reliable, and have way to many bug, crashes, etc.
Posts: 971
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
44
The HDHomerun setup program in Windows will generate stream files for all your channels in a directory in your user directory if you select xbmc as the primary app, add this directory to xbmc as a source then get an xml tv file with mc2xml or whatever, load the file into the TV Guide add on and link the streams to the channels. You now have live tv with a guide
If I have been of help, please add to my reputation as a way of saying thanks, it's free.