Posts: 14
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
0
Hi everyone,
I recently finished building a new HTPC , based on Intel Pentium Dual Core G2030 ivy. Initially I planned to also add a Radeon HD 5450 that I allready have but I have noticed that it plays 1080p just perfect with the integrated card, so now I am wondering if there is any reason for me to add the radeon at all.
Would I get a better picture quality if I use the dedicated GPU ? (I couldn'd find any clear answer regarding this ... if there is one) As I said performance wise it's perfect as it is right now , HD audio and everything but I can't really tell about picture quality ...
Thanks
Mircea
Posts: 625
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
23
"If it isn't broke don't touch" so goes the old saying. If you can not see a reason for installing another card then don't do it. I would think the picture quality will be the same and adding another card will only increase power usage.
Posts: 108
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
1
Agreed. It can be tough to get things to look perfect. If you are already there, just leave it alone.
Posts: 257
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation:
2
milli
Senior Member
Posts: 257
Intel graphics has issues used with dxva causing artifacts/banding in some HD videos. If you have such videos then radeon would help.
Posts: 47
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
0
u got told this is your previous thread
Posts: 23,266
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
1,074
fritsch
Team-Kodi Developer
Posts: 23,266
If you don't see it with _your_ eyes, than it is not worth for even looking at such tests.
First decide what functions / features you expect from a system. Then decide for the hardware. Don't waste your money on crap.
Posts: 824
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
6
I wouldn't mind CPU decoding for playback, but at least to me nVidia VDPAU renderer looks substantially better than software decoding. Not sure why, but software decoding seems to have little bit washed out colors and less sharp picture when compared to VDPAU.
Posts: 3,571
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
110
As a professional photographer I am very sensitive to picture quality. Nvidia Linux is good, but ATI on windows (with all the processing crap turned off) is I think the best. I spent hours evaluating this precise issue.
Addons I wrote &/or maintain:
OzWeather (Australian BOM weather) | Check Previous Episode | Playback Resumer | Unpause Jumpback | XSqueezeDisplay | (Legacy - XSqueeze & XZen)
Sorry, no help w/out a
*full debug log*.
Posts: 52
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
0
2013-09-04, 17:33
(This post was last modified: 2013-09-04, 17:34 by nmt1978.)
I had used HTPC + video card Geforce 9500 + XBMC to wach movies for years on TV.
Earlier this year i bought my first projector (Optoma HD20). I have had no problem with picture quality until that day when i brought an oppo 103 from my friend.
I had time to compare the picture quality between that HTPC and oppo and realized that oppo produced a substantial better picture quality which I can see it very clearly through my eyes
I love XBMC of course, then i kept my HTPC but routed it video signal through HDMI input of oppo and output from oppo to projector. Picture quality has been significally improved.
So, if PQ is really your concern, AND IF YOU USE PROJECTOR, i strongly recommend you to buy an oppo and do my way. You can use whether Intel HD or a decent video card.