2014-08-18, 16:59
Thanks again for your help. I think this is probably too technical for me as I'm struggling to follow. However it seems like the Pi is capable for most types of audio.
(2014-08-18, 18:13)xbmcisbest Wrote: Ideally I am planning on using a lot of the XBMC plugins as well which I'm not sure how the Raspberry Pi would handle those?
(2014-08-18, 14:15)mediumdry Wrote: As far as I'm concerned, the low cost options are, from cheap to affordable:
-Raspberry Pi: apart from the price, it doesn't have many plusses, navigating the interface is simply slow, as is starting playback. If that doesn't bother you, go for it
-Android box: personally, I prefer the FireTV to others, as it has an ok remote and doesn't look too bad. Downsides are that it takes a bit more "hacking" to get working right (boot to xbmc, etc). The only thing that keeps me from using it as my main box is that you cannot adjust the audio volume, so you'll need a tv remote just for that.
-Chromebox: some nice options. Has the same drawback as the NUC, you need a remote with it. Most chromeboxes do not have have an IR receiver built in
-NUC: the 2820 works fine for most people, apart from a few (in my opinion very minor niggles). It is my current player. Only issue I have so far is with the remote, but that's because I don't have an RC6 one yet (I dislike most of them)
Anything bigger/more expensive is to fill a specific desire (do you need 3D, high bit audio, whatnot), so if you have specific wishes, start from that. The four options here don't use much electricity and work great for "average" (whatever that means really) use, so pick your pricepoint as low as you can without running into problem areas you actually care about.
Oh yeah, the Raspberry Pi and Chromeboxes run openelec or full linux, FireTV only runs Android, so limits you somewhat. The NUC can do openelec, linux or windows. FYI.
(2014-08-18, 16:29)xbmcisbest Wrote: So the Pi would support both?
Thanks