(2014-11-03, 00:25)ilovemymac Wrote: I think the addons are what make XBMC. That's what people want.
I understand piracy is bad but why start now? Icefilms and navix have been a part of XBMC as long as I can remember granted in the last few years it has grown.
But still seems silly to stop people from selling boxes with XBMC on them. Just because they have addons on them.
I love XBMC with or without addons personally but the addons make XBMC more well known.
I guess it just seems like a waste of time and from a long time XBMC user here makes me think a bit self righteous
Why would you not want people selling XBMC on eBay? Is it not great for the community the more who use it?
We don't think piracy is bad. We think that (among other reasons) other people think piracy is bad, and that those people would make our lives miserable if they think we're supporting piracy, even if we're not. It's a shitty situation, but that's how the real world works.
We, as Team Kodi and/or the XBMC Foundation, have no opinion on piracy. We have no stance on the issue. We do not think it is immoral or great. Even if we did, laws are different in different areas, and we're not interested in policing the end user.
Even if we were pro-piracy, IceFilms and Navi-X quality is horrible. I mean if you're going to pirate, pirate something with decent quality that doesn't make your eyes bleed.
Even if those add-ons were using high quality video, the number of confused users who think XBMC
is a video streaming site is enough of a support burden to drive some people away from helping out in the community. How many posts do we have to deal with when people go "Why is XBMC down?" or "Why isn't the new Transformers movie out on XBMC?" and crap like that?
We are not synonymous with those add-ons. They don't add any value to the program, not even for pirates (seriously, don't make me spell out how to pirate the right way. It's so easy and doesn't involve any shittastic file locker sites.).
This is like saying that Mozilla shouldn't be mad if people were successfully marketing FireFox as only being for porn. You don't think that wouldn't bother them? That wouldn't be an issue for their sponsors, partners, or even the families of the people who work there? Does porn make Fire Fox better? You bet your ass it does. But FireFox is a neutral web browser. It just pulls up whatever you point it to. It's not for or against porn. It's just a browser.
XBMC/Kodi is just a video player for the 10-foot interface (living room with a remote). It doesn't have to be a moral argument for something like this to cause us issues. This isn't a theory, either, as these are actual issues we've been dealing with ever since the Android boom.
EDIT: removed some of the "jesus tap dancing christ" comments. Historians are divided on if he could tap dance or not.