crash123
Senior Member 
Posts: 258Joined: Oct 2008 Reputation: 0 Location: New Plymouth, New Zealand |
2009-11-23 10:55
Post: #51
Even more lol. *shakes head*
|
| find quote |
|
surge
Junior Member Posts: 2 Joined: Aug 2009 Reputation: 0 |
2009-12-27 04:20
Post: #52
motd2k Wrote:I find this exceptionally hard to believe... the only way that could be the case is with Linux. Yeah, agreed. My Mediaserver box is a Pentium 4 with 2GB ram...I have a GTS250 video card but even that (with purevideo or DXVA) does not play 1080p content well at all compared to coreavc 2.0 with CUDA. Really wish XBMC supported at least some decent HD decoder...oh well. Back to Windows Media Center (lol) for now I guess. |
| find quote |
|
waldo22
Member+ Posts: 764 Joined: Sep 2007 Reputation: 2 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA |
2009-12-27 18:16
Post: #53
surge Wrote:Really wish XBMC supported at least some decent HD decoder...oh well. Huh? Search the forums for VDPAU (under Linux) or CrystalHD or DXVA. The new DirectX Windows branch supports Broadcom's CrystalHD decoder with their DirectShow filter, and should support DXVA shortly, if it doesn't already. VDPAU under Linux is simply awesome, and the AppleTV (and all platforms) will soon support the CrystalHD. -Wes |
| find quote |
|
Scandermore
Junior Member Posts: 27 Joined: Dec 2009 Reputation: 0 |
2010-01-04 14:25
Post: #54
I also think that XBMC should have any way to support external decoder, like CoreAVC. I would pay gladly 8€, to have CoreAVC running with XBMC. Not only CoreAVC is one of the best decoders, but also supports CUDA, wich, in my case, would reduce A LOT the CPU use. I don't think the "extra" cost would be a problem, for those who really want it. I would pay gladly another 8€ for the XBMC plugin, if it was available.
Hope to see it some day. aLeX |
| find quote |
|
AndyE
Junior Member Posts: 26 Joined: Jan 2010 Reputation: 0 |
2010-01-17 01:10
Post: #55
What benefit does XBMC get from adding CoreAVC support?
The only benefit I see is that a limited number of users getting support for a paid codec Why do we even need to spend time on CoreAVC when we have VDPAU right now, Dxvba soon, and ffmpeg-MT soonish. Also, you can already specify external players, so why not use an external player that is configured with CoreAVC? CoreCodec has much more to gain than XBMC from the implementation of CoreAVC support. Maybe people should ask CoreAVC a compatibility patch for ffmpeg or to financially XBMC/ffmpeg |
| find quote |
|
waldo22
Member+ Posts: 764 Joined: Sep 2007 Reputation: 2 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA |
2010-01-17 03:34
Post: #56
Actually, we should be able to use CoreAVC now with Tiben20's DSPlayer (DirectShow branch).
CoreAVC uses DirectShow filters. I dunno, it should be trivial to implement. Tiben did it for the Broadcom CrystalHD DS filter pretty quickly. -Wes |
| find quote |
Search
Help