Skin Based Full Media Flagging - a holdover until the real deal is done

  Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Reply
mafis90 Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #31
mYre that's right.

At the moment i am working on a new Media Manager Software. On WE is the First Version ready. It's supporting Multi Scraper, everyone can made Scraper for Moviesites. ( I made one for OFDB :-) ). Also it supports Fileinfos,Mono Support,... . But you will see it on WE.

For more Infos everyone contact me on irc Direct to IRC-Channel
mafis90
(This post was last modified: 2009-03-31 16:15 by mafis90.)
find quote
Ayla Offline
Fan
Posts: 585
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #32
mafis90 Wrote:mYre that's right.

At the moment i am working on a new Media Manager Software. On WE is the First Version ready. It's supporting Multi Scraper, everyone can made Scraper for Moviesites. ( I made one for OFDB :-) ). Also it supports Fileinfos,... . But you will see it on WE.

mafis90

"WE" could be WEdnesday or it could be WeekEnd Big Grin
find quote
mafis90 Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #33
Weekend :-D
find quote
mYre Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 0
Post: #34
Ayla Wrote:"WE" could be WEdnesday or it could be WeekEnd Big Grin

in germany we all say WE for weekend Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin

@mafis90: sounds quite good, if its released i will give it a try Smile because the shit is that all new movie managers (MIP, Media Companion) are written to support mostly imdb.com, Media Companion has the ability to scrape from imdb.de but imdb.de just sucks sorry^^ moviemaze, ofdb would be great on md or MIP.

so far cheeeeers
find quote
Ayla Offline
Fan
Posts: 585
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #35
mafis90 Wrote:Weekend :-D

Hehe, alright then Smile

Btw. will it be a more simple program than MIP and Media Companion?

Maybe like nfoscraper?

I like MIP and MC but there are just so many options and buttons in the GUI, makes it a little cluttered imo.
find quote
mafis90 Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #36
It`s a full Media Manager like MIP and MC, but it's easy. At the Moment 4 Buttons on Mainscreen.
find quote
Ayla Offline
Fan
Posts: 585
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #37
mafis90 Wrote:It`s a full Media Manager like MIP and MC, but it's easy. At the Moment 4 Buttons on Mainscreen.

OK, sounds cool.

Maybe post a screenshot Smile

PS. Remember to include Aeon Stark support, if you can.
- Writing mediainfo to the .nfo and support for 2 .tbn's (bla.tbn & bla-big.tbn).
find quote
BliBlaBlo Offline
Member
Posts: 78
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 0
Post: #38
And for Windows i guess?
Would be soooo great if there was a good alternative for MediaCompanion for OSX Smile
find quote
mafis90 Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #39
All be planned, Mono Support = OSX Support, but for more dissusion please come to IRC Channel in my Signature.
find quote
esdubu Offline
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #40
Is this not going to be a problem if the tagging info is stored in the writers part of the nfo, this is what happened with mine

[Image: screenshot001e.jpg]
find quote
mYre Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 0
Post: #41
i guess djh will work it out that we dont have to tag it in the credit section, because all information is already right with the new MIP build, there are sections for: movie height, width, channels, codec and so on so the credit tag will be available again^^ because right now the tags in the credit section just brings nothing^^

cheeeeeers
find quote
natethomas Online
Team-XBMC Community Manager
Posts: 3,446
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 61
Location: Kansas
Post: #42
midgetspy Wrote:I know, I currently have an NFO file for every movie but it wasn't generated with MIP. I'm wondering if I will be able to simply scan my media and edit my existing NFOs or whether I will have to configure & use MIP for this.

My problem with this question is I don't know what the point would be. The proposed solution is for MIP to scan your video files and report (by means of flags) the various important pieces of information in the "credits" section of the nfo, and those pieces of information would then be read by the Aeon skin. I guess you could simply type the flags into the credits section, if you wanted, but no other programs are currently available to do this. As such, if you are going to do it all by hand, you may as well use the current solution of renaming video files.
find quote
LaTropa64 Offline
Fan
Posts: 649
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 0
Post: #43
esdubu Wrote:Is this not going to be a problem if the tagging info is stored in the writers part of the nfo, this is what happened with mine

[I MG]http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/1264/screenshot001e.jpg[/img]

I actually like that. I'm not as interested in the writer as I am in the resolution and audio format. Maybe make the field scroll so we can see all the information in it.
find quote
MrTourettes Offline
Fan
Posts: 330
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 1
Location: Cambridge
Post: #44
I think you guys are worrying too much. I am sure when the skin reads the writter informatiuon it will seperate it.

Basically I assume the skinh will work like this.

Read writer string.

Copy writer sectgion of string to screen in writer section.

Read rest of string and put codecs and info etc in the fields they need to go into.

Just because all that info is in one string does not mean that whole string has to be displaied in teh writer section onscreen.

I am sure you will understand when the new release of the skin is done.

Basically the Writer string is just a holder for information. You can put as much info as you like in it and then the skin will use it as it needs. At the moment the skin uses the whole string for the writer info but thats just how it was meant to work. Now that the string is going to be used for more info the code wil just be re-written to handle multi strings in that one.
(This post was last modified: 2009-03-31 23:19 by MrTourettes.)
find quote
djh_ Offline
Aeon Project Founder
Posts: 1,890
Joined: Jun 2007
Post: #45
Well, we can't have it interfering with the Writer field - not visibly, at least. And as far as I know there's no way of telling XBMC not to display *some* of a returned string. So I'd recommend either using another field that XBMC can read or adding the new info to the existing Writer value, with a shitload of spaces before it so it doesn't display on-screen.
find quote
Post Reply