2009-05-11, 18:23
Once upon a time I used the now obsolete -big.png naming for the large, high res movie posters. However, now that .TBN's are the only ones supported I was thinking about redoing my thumbnails with better quality ones from getvideoartwork.com.
Was wondering if this would slow down browsing when in showcase? Right now all of my thumbs are around 400 or 300 pixels high. I can hold down the arrow keys and fly through my 2000+ movie collection without any lag. I would like to do this to some degree. Does XBMC automatically cache them in a smaller size?
I did a few already and have noticed that when using the info view they do not seem to be as high of quality as when I used the big.png way. Thanks for any input!
Was wondering if this would slow down browsing when in showcase? Right now all of my thumbs are around 400 or 300 pixels high. I can hold down the arrow keys and fly through my 2000+ movie collection without any lag. I would like to do this to some degree. Does XBMC automatically cache them in a smaller size?
I did a few already and have noticed that when using the info view they do not seem to be as high of quality as when I used the big.png way. Thanks for any input!