
I can't reproduce.
Without details on how to reproduce, we may be at a standstill.
tslayer
Team-XBMC Developer Joined: Oct 2003 Reputation: 12 |
2009-05-23 21:52
Post: #21
Sorry.. No idea
![]() I can't reproduce. Without details on how to reproduce, we may be at a standstill. 42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting. Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules. For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first. |
| find quote |
oscarmax
Junior Member Posts: 9 Joined: Sep 2008 Reputation: 0 |
2009-05-23 23:14
Post: #22
Not easy to debug without beeing able to reproduce the fault - it's very annoying that I have this problem since I have had ProjectM working in the past. I think it was when I switched to Ubuntu Intrepid It went dark.
Im almost considering wiping the whole thing and do a complete reinstall of Ubuntu and the recompile xbmc and hoping that that will make it work. There is nothing with the graphics drivers I have to adjust to get it to work - I have a Nvidia card it the box? |
| find quote |
succo
Fan Posts: 361 Joined: Mar 2008 Reputation: 0 Location: Taranto, Italy |
2009-05-23 23:42
Post: #23
tslayer, are you running xbmc in standalone mode (from a folder) or installed as a package/made install?
if you run it standalone it could be what makes it work for you but not for us... btw what is your XBMC_HOME setting set to? for me it's /usr/share/xbmc what i want to try now is to copy projectm.conf to /usr/share/xbmc/userdata/visualizations and see... |
| find quote |
tslayer
Team-XBMC Developer Joined: Oct 2003 Reputation: 12 |
2009-05-24 00:39
Post: #24
I compile using regular : ./configure; make; sudo make install
So, it is installed in /usr/local/share/xbmc And I just use xbmc to run it (which invokes /usr/local/bin/xbmc script). This is the normal way to do it. 42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting. Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules. For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first. |
| find quote |
succo
Fan Posts: 361 Joined: Mar 2008 Reputation: 0 Location: Taranto, Italy |
2009-05-24 11:20
Post: #25
i compile with --enable-avahi --enable-mid --enable-vdpau --disable-pulse --prefix=/usr so that xbmc is installed in /usr/share/xbmc
again, i guess it can depend on one of three things: 1: the distro (what distro are you on?) 2: the hardware/drivers (all of my pcs are nvidia-based, what's yours?) 3: some missing dependency (i have all the ones detailed in README.linux, but who knows) i can't think of anything else... |
| find quote |
o_neill
Junior Member Posts: 43 Joined: Aug 2008 Reputation: 0 |
2009-05-24 16:01
Post: #26
Some more details from me:
- I always compile with --disable-pulse -- - my files are played form SMB - the XBMC_HOME variable had no influence - using NVIDIA 9400GT usually with VDPAU enabled, XBMC is set to 1080p - my XBMC installation is located in /user/share/xbmc. |
| find quote |
tslayer
Team-XBMC Developer Joined: Oct 2003 Reputation: 12 |
2009-05-24 17:39
Post: #27
I have nvidia 9500GT. vdpau enabled. pulse enabled/disabled does not matter as I have tested both.
I use ubuntu 8.04(32-bit). Latest beta drivers from nvidia. 185.18.#. For arguments sake, test without specifying a new --prefix. Keep it default and see. That is the only other difference really. 42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting. Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules. For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first.
(This post was last modified: 2009-05-24 17:42 by tslayer.)
|
| find quote |
succo
Fan Posts: 361 Joined: Mar 2008 Reputation: 0 Location: Taranto, Italy |
2009-05-24 19:36
Post: #28
so you're on ubuntu 8.04... this seems to me to be a BIG difference
i made uninstall and re-made without any prefix, so now it's installed in /usr/local/share/xbmc i used the prefix because, as far as i can remember, ppa builds used /usr instead of the default /usr/local no difference at all... my next move will be to try live, as it should e jaunty based, so if it does work it myst be something with my environment will let you know edit: just noticed that, even if i exported XBMC_HOME i have a line in the terminal log saying "[PresetLoader] ENOENT error. The path "/usr/share/xbmc/visualisations/projectM" probably does not exist. "man open" for more info." will reboot and see if anything changes
(This post was last modified: 2009-05-24 19:49 by succo.)
|
| find quote |
succo
Fan Posts: 361 Joined: Mar 2008 Reputation: 0 Location: Taranto, Italy |
2009-05-24 20:23
Post: #29
mmmmmmmh... somehow XBMC_HOME gets hardcoded in projectm at configure time, as even rebooting gave me the same error
anyway, made reallyclean and re-configured, and noticed that i have a warning regarding ftgl not being installed (i guess this is to show track names and so on) anyway, just installed libftgl-dev (shouldn't it be listed in README.linux?), re-configured, re-made, re-made install (in /usr/local) and say what? nothing changed ![]() p.s. just noticed that the preset path is not hardcoded during configure, but is in .xbmc/userdata/visualizations/projectM.conf edited that too
|
| find quote |
tslayer
Team-XBMC Developer Joined: Oct 2003 Reputation: 12 |
2009-05-24 20:32
Post: #30
XBMC_HOME should not be needed.
Show me your console output. 42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting. Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules. For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first. |
| find quote |