New Build: v0.6.7

  Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Reply
Nazgulled Offline
Fan
Posts: 514
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 0
Post: #41
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I definitely didn't know that.

It's odd that the system works like that though. There should be a way to hook/unhook by code. But that's a Google/Android issue, I know, I'm just saying.
find quote
the_alien Offline
Team-XBMC Android Remote Developer
Posts: 422
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #42
Nazgulled Wrote:Still, can't you hook to those events/triggers only when the options are enabled? And unhook them when the options are not select? Wouldn't that work?

The hooks are defined in the xml file and registered to the system that way. You can't just unhook them... it is a static way right now.

But why bother? It is sitting there and is doing nothing. It wont cost you any of your battery life. And if it bothers you that much grab yourself the source and compile it without the hook.

XBMCLive Dharma beta 2 running on an ASRock ION 330 HT
find quote
Nazgulled Offline
Fan
Posts: 514
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 0
Post: #43
Cause I'm picky and I don't like things that shouldn't be there, that's all.

I could compile it like that, but in case I need to enable the option, I need to compile it again. That's why I wondered about hooking/unhooking by code. Apparently it's not possible and I understand that.
find quote
freezy Offline
Team-XBMC Android Remote Developer
Posts: 866
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 14
Location: Switzerland
Post: #44
Oh, boy.

Running XBMC on my HTPC, tablet, phone and pinball machine.
Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forums before posting. Do NOT e-mail Team-XBMC members asking for support. For troubleshooting and bug reporting, make sure you read this first.
find quote
Post Reply