[LINUX] HOW-TO get AmbX with X11 working using Boblight and CombustD
CharlesNasi
Junior Member Posts: 20 Joined: Nov 2008 Reputation: 0 Location: NL |
2010-06-09 00:43
Post: #81
Whoa! Cool that there are also other members are experimenting with the ambx lights! Cool to see improvements and mods in the scripts!
HTPC Specs: GA-MA78GM-S2h 1.0, 2GB Ram, Samsung S203B DVDrw, AMD Phenom X3 8650, Antec Fusion V2 Black, 1.5TB HDD, GeForce 9500GT running Ubuntu 10.04 and XBMC from SVN |
| find quote |
koekjestrommel
Junior Member Posts: 3 Joined: Jun 2010 Reputation: 0 |
2010-06-09 00:48
Post: #82
Also used Jaaps scripts, worked like a charm, perfect setup
![]() Kudos for you! |
| find quote |
Kode
fanart.tv admin Posts: 713 Joined: Mar 2010 Reputation: 14 |
2010-06-09 01:09
Post: #83
koekjestrommel: play with the saturation, timing, speed and value settings, they will help you get a better effect
|
| find quote |
Tijntje
Junior Member Posts: 49 Joined: Jan 2010 Reputation: 0 |
2010-06-10 21:42
Post: #84
hello,
i've bought a AMBX starterkit from ebay for 20€. It works but it stutters my video's. I use a mac mini C2D 1.83 with 1gb ram and a crystal HD decoder. any thoughts? Are you guys playing 720p and 1080p video's? greetings |
| find quote |
Kode
fanart.tv admin Posts: 713 Joined: Mar 2010 Reputation: 14 |
2010-06-10 21:46
Post: #85
Are you using Windows or Live/Linux? If Live/Linux what settings are you using? Mine works fine with 720p and 1080p
*edit* half asleep, Are you using the mac specific version of xbmc? and again, what are your settings
(This post was last modified: 2010-06-10 21:50 by Kode.)
|
| find quote |
Tijntje
Junior Member Posts: 49 Joined: Jan 2010 Reputation: 0 |
2010-06-10 21:56
Post: #86
Kode Wrote:Are you using Windows or Live/Linux? If Live/Linux what settings are you using? Mine works fine with 720p and 1080p i'm on linux ubuntu karmic, xbmc v28256, crystal hd 1.03 boblight-X11 -s 10 -t 0.1 -a 20 -x --> works boblight-X11 -s 10 -t 0.1 -a 20 --> stutters as I understand it should be the other way around?? |
| find quote |
Kode
fanart.tv admin Posts: 713 Joined: Mar 2010 Reputation: 14 |
2010-06-10 22:07
Post: #87
I thought -x used the slower one as well, though its actually a little ambiguous depending on whether (slow!) is to using -x or whether its saying XShmGetImage (used by default) is slow, only bob can answer that one. Have you tried setting different values to see if it makes any difference? Also, if -x is working for you, does it matter?
|
| find quote |
bobo1on1
cheapass Team-XBMC Developer Joined: Dec 2008 Reputation: 21 |
2010-06-10 22:27
Post: #88
Depends on your setup which one is faster, for me XShmGetImage is the faster one.
However boblight-X11 from http://code.google.com/p/boblight/ can use XRender to scale down the root window before copying it into system ram, which is the fastest by far. Sadly it doesn't work too well when using it on nvidia with flipping on and a fullscreen opengl app. |
| find quote |
Tijntje
Junior Member Posts: 49 Joined: Jan 2010 Reputation: 0 |
2010-06-10 22:38
Post: #89
bobo1on1 Wrote:Depends on your setup which one is faster, for me XShmGetImage is the faster one. I'm using an intel gpu GMA950, how can I test this Xrender?? When I use the default, (XShmGetImage?) setting I get framedrops and stutter, CPU at 80% |
| find quote |
koekjestrommel
Junior Member Posts: 3 Joined: Jun 2010 Reputation: 0 |
2010-06-10 22:47
Post: #90
|
| find quote |



Search
Help