XBMC gets dedicated remote - Motorola Nyxboard

  Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Reply
Malard Offline
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 401
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 16
Location: Peterborough, UK
Post: #46
I've asked the question to Motorola about coming up with a solution to back lighting the existing remote. I will feedback if its going to get in to this version.

The technical hurdle is that most of the circuitry is already built at this point, adding lights wouldn't be a problem, but then everything has to get re-worked.

The next version will defiantly have a back lit after the various requests.

@BORIStheBLADE I dont quite follow, the idea is you should be able to convert all your remotes into just this one device using the programmable IR feature
find quote
PatK Offline
Donor
Posts: 3,344
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 75
Location: Canada
Star   
Post: #47
Engadget has some nice renders at the jump, and it will support out of the box Mac, Windows, Linux and the original Apple TV

http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/motor...claims-it/
find quote
BORIStheBLADE Offline
Fan
Posts: 746
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 0
Location: California
Post: #48
Malard Wrote:@BORIStheBLADE I dont quite follow, the idea is you should be able to convert all your remotes into just this one device using the programmable IR feature


So what your implying is we can use this new Motorola remote as a universal remote then?

I'm just trying to figure out if and how a Harmony can be used without the MCE IR with this new device.

Mike


find quote
joebrady Offline
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 1,647
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 6
Location: Floyds Knobs, IN
Post: #49
The RF part is for your HTPC. (receiver included) The IR part is for all your other devices, they already have receivers.
find quote
joethefox Offline
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 1,288
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 22
Post: #50
One question: in the keyboard side there is a mouse, but it's a key up/down/left/right or it's a real mouse like the imon pad for example? If it act as up/down/left/right I think that this remote is perfect also as M.A.M.E. gamepad! Big Grin
find quote
jalyst Offline
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 0
Post: #51
@Malard

To what extent is this a "true" universal remote?
Even if it's no better than a harmony one in terms of programmability I'll be happy.
But any less & it'd be a disappointment, unless the keyb/mouse functionality is stellar.

I currently use a Harmony One and a URC MX-980...
The latter's used far more as it's far more versatile, but the former's fun too.

Thanks!

Philmatic Wrote:Unfortunately with no back light, it doesn't make it any better than the Boxee remote, which looks much better and $20 cheaper.

But the Boxee remote isn't also a IR universal (learning/programmable) remote is it?
That's a big feature this has that the boxee remote doesn't, assuming it's UR aspect isn't flakey/limited.

joethefox Wrote:One question: in the keyboard side there is a mouse, but it's a key up/down/left/right or it's a real mouse like the imon pad for example? If it act as up/down/left/right I think that this remote is perfect also as M.A.M.E. gamepad! Big Grin

I'd love to know that too, proper trackpad or mamepad Big Grin
(This post was last modified: 2011-04-06 18:33 by jalyst.)
find quote
falafael Offline
Fan
Posts: 498
Joined: Aug 2006
Reputation: 1
Location: Nottinghamshire, united kingdom
Post: #52
Have just seen this thread, and must say that this will do for me very nicely, i have already emailed them to pre-order it.

What gets me is the amount of people bitching about backlight, come on, eventually you get the 'feel' of the remote anyways, i couldn't give a rats ass about lighting on it, as long as it does what it says it does.

In the end, this is of mallards back, and for bringing something like this to the xbmc community, he should be commended!
Well done!!
xbmc goes from strength to strength!
Big Grin

[Image: widget]
find quote
topfs2 Offline
Team-Kodi Developer
Posts: 4,045
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 10
Post: #53
Indeed. It looks to be a really nice remote, I have only felt it but not actually used it just yet but the feeling is quite nice. Its sturdy and quite good size.

If all this goes well for Malard I do hope he will be able to create a simpler remote for a cheaper price, i.e. something like the apple remote but perhaps a few more buttons Smile

If you have problems please read this before posting

Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting.
Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules.
For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first.

[Image: badge.gif]

"Well Im gonna download the code and look at it a bit but I'm certainly not a really good C/C++ programer but I'd help as much as I can, I mostly write in C#."
find quote
falafael Offline
Fan
Posts: 498
Joined: Aug 2006
Reputation: 1
Location: Nottinghamshire, united kingdom
Post: #54
currently, in the living room, i have to use a maplins £15 mce remote, limited, but works, and a wireless keyboard amd mouse....so this will make these redundant, get rid of my amp and tv remote, and have just the one remote...and it has the info button, one i have missed since the original xbox remote!!

Sorted! Smile

[Image: widget]
find quote
Malard Offline
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 401
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 16
Location: Peterborough, UK
Post: #55
Just spot poll, but if I could do a similar remote, without the keyboard, but it would be a fraction of the price, would people want that as another option?

I've asked about the backlight, it might be possible at this late stage, but do people really think it's a deal breaker?

My question is this: What do you need the keyboard for in a dark room for, except for filtering for a movie? (at which point in theory you could have a light on)
find quote
joebrady Offline
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 1,647
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 6
Location: Floyds Knobs, IN
Post: #56
Would glow-in-the-dark material for the symbols, instead of back-lit appease most?
find quote
falafael Offline
Fan
Posts: 498
Joined: Aug 2006
Reputation: 1
Location: Nottinghamshire, united kingdom
Post: #57
If people with theatres wanted the backlight issue, why don't they use the cinema experience script which may be having home automation soon, in the end i assumed when your watching a movie in your theatre, your watching the movie, not fiddling with a remote....i suppose you could always throw in a £1.99 torch for those who want backlight!

Ok, got to do my 9hrs!!

[Image: widget]
find quote
tboooe Offline
Fan
Posts: 456
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 0
Post: #58
Malard Wrote:Just spot poll, but if I could do a similar remote, without the keyboard, but it would be a fraction of the price, would people want that as another option?

I've asked about the backlight, it might be possible at this late stage, but do people really think it's a deal breaker?

My question is this: What do you need the keyboard for in a dark room for, except for filtering for a movie? (at which point in theory you could have a light on)

I think a remote only device without the keyboard would appeal to a wider audience. I for one would go for the keyboard version but I am also a total nerd and do a lot more on my HTPC other than run XBMC but I believe I am in the minority.

I also believe a backlight is important perhaps not in terms of absolute usability but in terms of perception. People are visual. They will perceive the remote to be easier to use, more functional, and more appealing if they can easily see the keys even though as it has been pointed out that over time the user will probably learn where all the keys are. Add that to the fact that almost all remotes now come with backlights and you will be fighting an uphill battle if you dont have a feature that is considered to be a basic one.
find quote
Malard Offline
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 401
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 16
Location: Peterborough, UK
Post: #59
tboooe Wrote:I think a remote only device without the keyboard would appeal to a wider audience. I for one would go for the keyboard version but I am also a total nerd and do a lot more on my HTPC other than run XBMC but I believe I am in the minority.

I also believe a backlight is important perhaps not in terms of absolute usability but in terms of perception. People are visual. They will perceive the remote to be easier to use, more functional, and more appealing if they can easily see the keys even though as it has been pointed out that over time the user will probably learn where all the keys are. Add that to the fact that almost all remotes now come with backlights and you will be fighting an uphill battle if you dont have a feature that is considered to be a basic one.

I get what your saying, one of the things i've tried to do with this remote, is go, do we really need xyz feature, KISS policy at work Smile
find quote
mobious Offline
Donor
Posts: 438
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 0
Post: #60
Malard Wrote:What do you find disappointing about the F keys?

Well on Live atleast, since this would technically be replacing any form of input device I would have on my XBMC nettop, I need the F keys to be able to switch from XBMC to terminal so I can pull an update or what have you. Its something people can live without but it would be a nice feature to have for us Live users.
find quote
Post Reply