dopethrone Wrote:Should the wireless transfer rates be that much slower than hardwired?
Yes, wireless transfers are always slower than gigabit cable. That's the tradeoff you make for not having wires
Superorb
Fan Posts: 458 Joined: Jun 2009 Reputation: 0 |
2011-05-15 00:38
Post: #131
dopethrone Wrote:Should the wireless transfer rates be that much slower than hardwired? Yes, wireless transfers are always slower than gigabit cable. That's the tradeoff you make for not having wires
|
| find quote |
eskro
Posting Freak Joined: Nov 2010 Reputation: 156 |
2011-05-15 01:10
Post: #132
i would be happy at ~11 MBs via WiFi Transfer..
here at home, i get only ~4 MBs via WiFi Transfer... Both my WiFi card and Router are Single Band N Draft2 (300MBs)....
(This post was last modified: 2011-05-15 01:16 by eskro.)
|
| find quote |
dopethrone
Junior Member Posts: 18 Joined: Jan 2011 Reputation: 0 |
2011-05-15 01:15
Post: #133
OK thanks guys. I'll stop worrying about it.
|
| find quote |
eskro
Posting Freak Joined: Nov 2010 Reputation: 156 |
2011-05-15 01:17
Post: #134
eskro Wrote:i would be happy at ~11 MBs via WiFi Transfer.. By the way guys, is this normal :/ ?? |
| find quote |
bodhi
Fan Joined: Sep 2010 Reputation: 1 |
2011-05-19 11:43
Post: #135
eskro Wrote:By the way guys, is this normal :/ ?? It is normal. Especially if your network is 2.4Ghz. Speed will vary due to interferences with neighbors 2.4Ghz networks. The best I ever got with a perfect line-of-sight between the router and HTPC on a 5Ghz band network is 14 MBs (no interference). But with non-line-of sight router-to-laptop on 2.4 Ghz network it varies from 4 to 6 MBs. |
| find quote |
eskro
Posting Freak Joined: Nov 2010 Reputation: 156 |
2011-05-19 18:40
Post: #136
thanks bodhi, now at least i'll stop worrying...
|
| find quote |
mtense
Junior Member Posts: 1 Joined: Apr 2009 Reputation: 0 |
2011-05-23 18:44
Post: #137
Awesome thread. Thanks for all the info.
What are your thoughts on a Group 0.5 for playing music only? I have a couple xboxs, but they are big and clunky. I am looking for something small, cheap, low power and silent that I can use to play music through a powered speaker. Video is optional as I can use web interface or some of the remote apps to control xmbc. How about someday using android remote to control my android xbmc box ;-) Best, mtense |
| find quote |
puulima
Senior Member Joined: May 2010 Reputation: 1 |
2011-06-12 05:05
Post: #138
Been searching the posts looking for some info on whether the latest Zino's will work (nicely) with XBMC and no luck - so asking here.
Here's the link: 4 Zino PC's to Compare Obviously trying to keep the expense to a minimum. Intended Use: - Not concerned about playing 1080p, 720p is fine. - Would like to stream from Hulu/CBS etc - either within XBMC with BlueCop's Addon's or direct using Hulu desktop or the CBS website. - Not concerned with wireless, using a Gigabit network - Not interested in playing BluRay discs It's not an nVidia GPU - but if running Windows 7 - will the GPU handle the video processing or is it all on the CPU? Is 3 or 4 GB of memory enough? Also - I could upgrade the low end model to the same CPU as the next one for $50, but given I can get an additional Gig of memory and double the hard drive for another $30 - likely that would be better if the Sempron isn't beefy enough. Anybody using any of these currently? Thanks for the assistance... |
| find quote |
nemek
Senior Member Posts: 137 Joined: Feb 2011 Reputation: 0 Location: Poland |
2011-06-12 09:05
Post: #139
Quote:but if running Windows 7 - will the GPU handle the video processing or is it all on the CPU?Decode will be done on GPU (but you must running win7) |
| find quote |
puulima
Senior Member Joined: May 2010 Reputation: 1 |
2011-06-12 16:43
Post: #140
nemek Wrote:Decode will be done on GPU (but you must running win7) Thanks - Yes, I do plan to run Windows 7. So does the low end Zino HD have sufficient guts to handle all I need? - AMD Sempron™ II V160, 2.4GHz, 512K - 3GB2 Dual Channel DDR3 SDRAM at 1333MHz - Integrated ATI HD4250 Mobility RadeonTM The next model up has the same GPU but moves up to the AMD Athlon™ II X2 P360, 2.3GHz, Dual Core 1MB CPU. You don't get away form the integrated until the third (more pricey) one. From what I've read - an ION based nettop PC (Revo or Zotac type solution) would provide enough guts to handle things and less cost than the 3 upper models of the Zino? On the Zino - I read in another post that a user reinstalled Windows using the 32 bit version of Windows 7 instead - and that it "played" better with XBMC - wondering if there is any truth to that. Thanks for any additional feedback. |
| find quote |