How does MediaPortal (TVServer) backend compare to VDR or MythTV?

  Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Reply
SofaKng Offline
Donor
Posts: 385
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 0
Post: #1
I've been fooling around with VDR and MythTV for a couple of weeks and I've never been able to get it working quite right with my DVB-S card so I'm thinking about using MediaPortal.

MediaPortal worked pretty much immediately and with For The Record it should become a pretty advanced recording system.

However, I always think of Linux software as generally being more stable and faster so I'm a little leary about using MediaPortal even though I've already spent many, many hours trying to configure VDR/MythTV.

Anyways, what is the general opinion on this? How does MediaPortal (and the PVR backend) compare to VDR, MythTV, or even TVHeadend?
find quote
sronx Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 0
Post: #2
I would also appreciate a little comparison (features, speed etc.) between these backends. VDR seems to be a pain to install, so it is not that easy to test it.
find quote
SofaKng Offline
Donor
Posts: 385
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 0
Post: #3
Hmmm - nobody has compared these? Sad
find quote
Mike Lowrey Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 0
Post: #4
Well the biggest difference between those backends is the support of tv cards...

Since MediaPortal runs on Windows and nearly all tv cards have proper BDA drivers nearly all tv cards are supported by MediaPortal.

Since i've never used MythTV or VDR i can't tell you which one is more stable. But the TV Server is stable and reliable.
find quote
_BJ1 Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 0
Location: Germany
Post: #5
Sorry, this is the wrong subforum to discuss or compare several backends. Here's development for interfaces between xbmc and PVR-backends only. If you want to know something about vdr, visit http://www.vdrportal.de . There's an english subforum also.

_BJ1
find quote
hudo Offline
Fan
Posts: 450
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 5
Location: xbmcmediacenter.com
Post: #6
sronx Wrote:I would also appreciate a little comparison (features, speed etc.) between these backends. VDR seems to be a pain to install, so it is not that easy to test it.

It was a PITA!

Nowadays we have yaVDR. Give it a try.

[Image: phrase_6.gif]
find quote
thegeek Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 0
Post: #7
Does anyone know if the linux-based pvr servers give better channel switching time?
find quote
opdenkamp Offline
Team-XBMC PVR Developer
Posts: 1,942
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 24
Location: Heerlen, The Netherlands
Post: #8
moved to the general forums.

and with tvheadend as backend, switching channels is nearly instant.

opdenkamp / dushmaniac

xbmc-pvr [Eden-PVR builds] [now included in mainline XBMC, so no more source link here :)]
personal website: [link]

Found a problem with PVR? Report it on Trac, under "PVR - core components". Please attach the full debug log.

If you like my work, please consider donating to me and/or Team XBMC.
find quote
moontan77 Online
Fan
Posts: 344
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 0
Post: #9
how long are channel changes taking with mediaportal?

i'm using tvheadend at the moment but unfortunately my system is crashing every few days so I' thinking about giving on linux for the pvr.
find quote
Hudson_Hawk04 Offline
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,305
Joined: Oct 2006
Reputation: 3
Post: #10
I am keeping my eye on this:

http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=91054

I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.
Frank Sinatra
If I managed to help you in any way, please add to my reputation
.
find quote