Posts: 19,982
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
451
nickr
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 19,982
Intent is proved all the time in court. Of course a judge or jury cannot get inside the defendant's head at the time of an alleged crime, so intent must be inferred from actions.
EG a jury is often told by a prosecutor "The evidence of three reliable independent witnesses shows that defendant jumped on the complainant's head five times while wearing working boots, and then kicked him ten times in the ribs. You should infer from those facts that he must have intended serious harm".
(IAAL).
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Posts: 3,420
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
95
Piers
R.I.P. (2024)
Posts: 3,420
2016-01-21, 07:47
(This post was last modified: 2016-01-21, 07:48 by Piers.)
Why is this continuing? A person knows whether or not they're watching content illegally. If they don't, they really shouldn't own a computer.
Posts: 31,445
Joined: Jan 2011
(2016-01-21, 07:47)Piers Wrote: Why is this continuing? A person knows whether or not they're watching content illegally. If they don't, they really shouldn't own a computer.
It's a discussion board. People discuss things. I'm not sure why some people are bothered by this, or why some other people feel the need to shitpost insulting images, but whatever floats their boat.