Posts: 217
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
0
2011-07-19, 20:56
(This post was last modified: 2011-07-19, 21:07 by atari800.)
That is powerful stuff you are using
I am using an Apple TV 1 with a CrystalHD card in it....
Basically that is:
1Ghz Pentium M (single core) processor
256 meg of ram
*Onboard NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 graphics processor with 64 MB of GDDR3 SDRAM.
40 gig hard drive
...This alone can do 720p with no problem
Broadcom CrystalHD .... allows this to decode everything upto 1080p
I paid about $65 for Apple tv on Amazon
and about $40 for the CrystalHD from Logic Supply
and I got 1 machine that houses all of my movies on USB and also is my MYSQL server and my PlayOn server
*AppleTv in Living room, bedrooms and guestroom
----
I did have Dell Inspiron 530
Quad core over clocked to 3 Ghz, 8 gig ram, ATI 5850 video card
Shared TV from desktop
Computer gave me DVD player and few other goodies. But I didnt want to put power house machines in each room
Posts: 217
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
0
I hope you (or anyone) does not think I was making an opinion AGAINST a pc for HTPC. Powerful or not.
I just wanted to give my opinion and tell you what I have running which I am very pleased with.
The APPLE TV's are "dual boot" so to speak, as I have UBUNTU Linux running on them (with usb stick drive attached) or back to APPLE TV mode (with no usb stick attached).
Linux mode run far more smoother and in true 1080p when running XBMC. Apple tv mode runs it in 720p.
As far as speed/performance goes...
Apple TV 2 (slowest interface and 720p is as high as I could get)... This is my friends
Apple TV 1 Normal Apple TV mode (720p is highest but performance is faster than ATV2)
APPLE TV 1 Ubuntu Mode (extremely fast on all skins and no problems with any movies I own)
---
I have Wall-E, Burn-E, Matrix 1-3 All in 1080p and they run fine over network
*I do have 3 test files from some thread on this forum that people had problems with that I do experience problems as well.
---
Apple tv 1 is very small form facotr - about the size of a router, or a typical cable modem
Posts: 5
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
0
Just to help me decide what to buy, are you saying that the first generation apple tv performs better than the ATV2?
I could only assume that this is because XBMC has been refined over the years for ATV1.
Thanks,
Lee
Posts: 542
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation:
1
2011-07-20, 20:22
(This post was last modified: 2011-07-20, 20:26 by .:B:..)
You can get a cheap platform. Even an Atom, but performance-wise I would take an entry-level regular x86 that isn't as handicaped as an Atom - say, an Intel G6950.
Take a cheap entry-level Intel or AMD CPU (preferably dualcore), and get an equally entry-level nVidia GPU so you can use VDPAU. With GPU-accelerated video decoding you don't need any oomph whatsoever. You can make do with a very basic setup. I think 2 GB RAM would be plenty btw, but that all depends on what else you want that box to do. Xbmc certainly doesn't need that much RAM. A Zacate setup might be interesting, but I'm afraid ATi's GPU support on Linux isn't close to nVidia's, so it's risky to bet on an ATi GPU for hardware acceleration for now.
As for the ATV1 vs ATV2, if you have the chance I'd definitely go for an ATV1 + CrystalHD (the BCM970015 model though, not the BCM970012 one). The ATV1 is plain x86, the ATV2 is ARM afaik, and your hacking possibilities on the ATV2 are rather limited.
* MikroTik RB5009UG+S+IN :: ZyXEL GS1900-8HP v1 :: EAP615-Wall v1 :: Netgear GS108T v3 running OpenWrt 23.05
* LibreELEC 11:
HTPC Gigabyte Brix GB-BXA8-5545 with
CEC adapter, Sony XR-64A84K ::
Desktop AMD Ryzen 7 5800X / Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon 6700XT / 27" Dell U2717D QHD
* Debian Bookworm x86_64: Celeron G1610, NFS/MariaDB/ZFS server
*
Blog
Posts: 217
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
0
@B:
I have seen both perform..
Atv1 with Broadcom crystalhd is much faster than atv2
Atv2 downscales 1080 movies to 720 as well