2011-08-01, 11:04
Greetings,
When I asked about my problem with slow thumbnail generation for high-resolution images, jmarshall explained to me (just as he did elsewhere before) that EXIF thumbnails are not used because their resolution is to small (160x120). But to be honest, when I have 500+ pictures in a folder and I want to quickly find a specific picture while a single thumbnail is generated every second, it's quite a pain in the neck. IMHO it would be fair to allow the user to force XBMC to use low-resolution thumbnails (or display an EXIF thumbnail first and then start generating prettier thumbnails in the background).
I just wanted to raise this issue on the feature request forum before posting an official feature request via Trac. Maybe I am missing something here, but from my point of view not giving the user an option to use lower resolution images may be unfair towards low-end hardware users.
When I asked about my problem with slow thumbnail generation for high-resolution images, jmarshall explained to me (just as he did elsewhere before) that EXIF thumbnails are not used because their resolution is to small (160x120). But to be honest, when I have 500+ pictures in a folder and I want to quickly find a specific picture while a single thumbnail is generated every second, it's quite a pain in the neck. IMHO it would be fair to allow the user to force XBMC to use low-resolution thumbnails (or display an EXIF thumbnail first and then start generating prettier thumbnails in the background).
I just wanted to raise this issue on the feature request forum before posting an official feature request via Trac. Maybe I am missing something here, but from my point of view not giving the user an option to use lower resolution images may be unfair towards low-end hardware users.