Quote:(2012-06-06 09:22)olympia Wrote:Fair enough. I do think that with the right settings (high image quality, -covers, photos, etc.) you could get decent quality but it's probably something better suited to another addon.(2012-06-06 07:29)saladasalad Wrote: [*]Google should also be added as a source for images, I understand that people should contribute images to fanart.tv but that is very time-consuming (plus I have contributed countless hours to editing MB) and finding images is something that google is already very good at.No way at all. This is a scraper for top quality.
Maybe someone could do a "google scraper" ?
Laziness and a sense of entitlement, they get the software for free, most likely the media for free, there are free programs and scrapers to make it all look pretty, that are powered by free community sites to gather all the information and images, why should they have to bother giving back to the community, come on olympia, be serious, what were you thinking?
I just think olympia is the lazy one here
He just doesn't want to make such a scraper to make all of our lives easier
-10 on the idea btw
Personally I want my money back!
And I can see a Google scrapper picking up the wrong band more times than people expect. I often get a different band when I search for artist images as they are mentioned on the same bill or as being similar.
What's the pb if the community grab fanart on google instead of fanart.tv ? It help the community, it's the main goal, isn't it ?
So it help global community, but not fanart.tv community ?!
Seriously, my idea isn't to don't help community, and if there was a google scraper, i will use it to grab fanart, even some with less quality than HD, it's a choice and it isn't a pb for me for instance (i don't have HD TV), but if i found good quality image, i could upload them on hdbackdrop or fanart.tv, i ever do it, so don't categorize people too quickly