2014-04-22, 21:18
I'm looking at the J1900 for proper 1080i deinterlacing too atm, question at fritsch why would you chose the 2955U? From what I see it is slower then the J1900 http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Celeron-J1...eron-2955U
(2014-04-22, 21:06)fritsch Wrote: Not sure about both. The big limit all AMD be it oss or via the blob xvba have is, that they are limited to 2048x1152 for now. I implemented 4K support in kernel some time ago - but the speed on the Kabini I had at this time was at 4 fps :-) So also not nice.
Build me a Celeron 2955U in mini itx format and I will buy it :-)
Quote:Since the Celeron J1900 chip doesn’t generate a lot of heat, the EB1037 can use passive cooling. There’s no fan in the case.
(2014-04-22, 21:26)fritsch Wrote: Though i don't like the IVB graphics, as it's even too slow for Lanczos 3.Only for 1080i50? Lanczos3 on 576i works fine here on i3-3225 with HD4000
(2014-04-22, 21:56)-DDD- Wrote:(2014-04-22, 21:26)fritsch Wrote: Though i don't like the IVB graphics, as it's even too slow for Lanczos 3.Only for 1080i50? Lanczos3 on 576i works fine here on i3-3225 with HD4000
(2014-04-22, 21:06)fritsch Wrote: Not sure about both. The big limit all AMD be it oss or via the blob xvba have is, that they are limited to 2048x1152 for now. I implemented 4K support in kernel some time ago - but the speed on the Kabini I had at this time was at 4 fps :-) So also not nice.
Build me a Celeron 2955U in mini itx format and I will buy it :-)
(2014-04-22, 21:18)ursli Wrote: I'm looking at the J1900 for proper 1080i deinterlacing too atm, question at fritsch why would you chose the 2955U? From what I see it is slower then the J1900 http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Celeron-J1...eron-2955U