Posts: 190
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation:
5
magao
Senior Member
Posts: 190
2014-01-30, 03:07
(This post was last modified: 2014-01-30, 23:58 by magao.)
Powerline adaptors are hit-or-miss - they can be a very cost-effective way to get usable networking through a house, but it's no guarantee. Factors affecting them include electrical phases (the adaptors must be on the same phase); length of cable between adaptors; quality of cable; other devices inserting interference; etc. The signal can go over circuit breakers, but that usually results in the cable length having too much of an impact.
For example, I recently worked to get my sister's place as well networked as possible (without running cables for now). Part of it was three powerline adaptors (coincidentally, the TP-Link 500Mbps) connecting the router, server and my nephew's computer.
Apart from having to manually add the three adaptors to the same network (automatic pairing only appears to work for two adaptors), we had the following issues.
The circuit looked like:
Router - Kitchen - Server - Bathroom - Nephew.
With just two on the circuit (Router <-> Nephew) ~17Mbps.
With all 3 adaptors on the circuit:
Router <-> Server ~17Mbps
Server <-> Nephew ~17Mbps
Router <-> Nephew ~8Mbps
As you can see, having an additional adaptor between reduces the performance greatly (the adaptors did not work as repeaters or amplifiers - it's possible other brands might, but I've found no information on it).
With all 3 adaptors on the circuit, and the dishwasher going:
Router <-> Server ~9Mbps
Server <-> Nephew ~16Mbps
Router <-> Nephew ~0.1Mbps
The one for my nephew's computer has now been moved to another powerpoint which appears to be on the other side of the router (presumably on the same circuit), and he's getting decent internet speeds (which is all he wants) but I don't think it's been tested with many other devices running yet.
BTW the 200Mbps adaptors don't have as good signal strength/noise cancellation, and drop off their speeds much quicker.
Posts: 58
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
0
I've been using the powerline adapters for some time now using a MX2 box and so far no problems. tried the wireless but had issues but with this no problems
Posts: 385
Joined: Oct 2011
I have been using powerline for 3.5 years now. With 5x TV/HD Display running (w/ HTPC onboard Gigabit Ethernet) I get an average of 23Mbps on each...)...
Belkin has a 1Gbps kit now...
Posts: 527
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
10
It's OK to use. Personally, I HATE USING IT. I hate it like NO OTHER. It makes me mad to all hell at the speedrate of it. It's decent for movies/internet, but for file transfers it's slow as sin.
I'd rather just hardwire and get decent speeds vs being capped out at 4MB/s no matter what.
Posts: 2,771
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
95
2014-01-31, 22:00
(This post was last modified: 2014-01-31, 22:00 by Prof Yaffle.)
All I can say to anyone is "try them and see". I had awful experience with powerline, and flood-wired instead, but I know people who swear by them (rather than "at them", as I did). You start to see that coming out here... opinions vary with the quality of your wiring, the length of the circuit, other devices you may have on it - all can significantly impact your results.
My personal experience is that it'd be faster to convert the BR into octal-shifted morse code, carve it in stone, take it upstairs and hand-etch it onto the receiving disc using faerie tears than it would be to transfer over PL, though.
Posts: 190
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation:
5
magao
Senior Member
Posts: 190
Agreed - if you have the option of putting cable in, it's worth the cost if you do anything serious with your network. First thing I did when the sale was finalised on my house was to cable the place up with Cat-6.
I've strongly recommended that my sister (well, brother-in-law really) get their place cabled. They've got the money, it looks like they've got access under the house ... to me it's a no-brainer instead of futzing around with powerline and wireless for fixed devices like desktop computers and TVs.
Posts: 17,855
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
1,055
Milhouse
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 17,855
As with WiFi, the success of Powerline is heavily dependent on the environment in which they are used.
I get 135Mbps actual throughput (tested with iperf) from a pair of 500-AV units, my brother gets over 100Mbps actual throughput between 3x 500-AV units. Yet other people with the same kit in a different property might not be able to get the system to work at all if their house wiring is ancient or their fridge or a phone charger wall wart is injecting a shedload of noise onto the mains supply.
There is no guarantee that Powerline will work, but it's usually worth a shot - there's usually a good chance you will get lucky!
My best bit of advice regarding Powerline: buy your gear only from a reputable retailer, and with a no-nonsense returns policy.
Texture Cache Maintenance Utility: Preload your texture cache for optimal UI performance. Remotely manage media libraries. Purge unused artwork to free up space. Find missing media. Configurable QA check to highlight metadata issues. Aid in diagnosis of library and cache related problems.
Posts: 275
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
7
tman12
Senior Member
Posts: 275
I figured there might be varying responses with some working well and others not working as well. The main point of this thread was to simply expand XBMC users options and let people know that such a product exists. For myself, it was worth it for me to spend $40 and try it out rather than wire a house that I'm renting and I'm glad I did. All of the comments are great though and it's definitely helpful for other users that want to evaluate their options. As far as file transfer, I can't really comment on that as I haven't really done any transferring over the adapters. I really only need 54Mbps (maximum Bluray bitrate) and I'm set.
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
2014-02-01, 21:08
(This post was last modified: 2014-02-02, 13:04 by un1versal.)
(2014-01-30, 23:57)magao Wrote: (2014-01-30, 20:13)twelvebore Wrote: (2014-01-30, 03:07)magao Wrote: As you can see, having an additional adaptor between reduces the performance greatly (the adaptors do not work as repeaters or amplifiers).
Really? I was under the impression that they do - or rather that some of them do.
My hopes prior to testing the TP-Link adaptors was that they would amplify, but testing proved otherwise. I haven't been able to find any reviews that give useful information one way or the other for other brands - nearly every review of Powerline adaptors I've ever been able to find has only been testing two adaptors.
My comment was meant to be specifically referring to the TP-Link adaptors - I'll go and change it to be clearer.
Normally when networking ~80 meters of cable cat5/e/6 to each portion of network segment before it needs amplifying and you amplify crap you get amped crap twice in return.
Considering powerlines use existing electrical wire and however its wired in the return portions also introduce noise in my completely non expert opinion. so ya good powerlines that do a good job in these areas would be best.